Great Writing
Just over a year ago I was a hobbyist writer with an audience of one. In many ways, that audience of one is still the one I want to impress the most. My wife, Lisa, has suffered many of my pieces of writing and given good advice; but she was an audience of only one. I had it in the back of my mind that one day I’d be published. Following her encouragement I sent some work to a literary agent, only to receive a polite refusal about two months later.
In the August of 2006 we got broadband. We must have been the last family in the known universe of both of our boys to be wired for unlimited internet access. (Along with: all our friends have Sky, PS3s, iPods etc etc ad nauseum) No longer would Lisa or I shout, ‘You’ve been on there long enough, when you pay the phone bill you can stay on all night.’
Truth be known, since that time, it has been me who has been online the most. I blame this on an inability to watch television without annoying my family. I ask questions and make comments, which to them, seem stupid or obvious. I also get bored very quickly. I also blame it on my discovery of the Great Writing website.
About a week after our broadband had been switched on I stumbled across GW. I’d never been a member of an online community before and was wary of virtual relationships and communication. Despite my reservations, I signed up and posted my first piece. Within an hour I’d had a few hits, a private message, and some feedback. From that moment on, I was hooked.
For someone like me who had more or less written in a vacuum, GW was a revelation. Coming home from work and finding a couple of e-mails alerting me to awaiting reviews was, and is, a real thrill. Just before I wrote this, I totted up the number of hits my pieces have had – over thirty-five thousand! (Some pieces have been removed) I know every hit does not represent a read, many probably gave up in disgust or boredom before they’d got much further than the first few sentences – but to go from an audience of one to thirty-five thousand hits in a year is quite something.
I don’t post this statistic to boast; in the real world of publishing, hits on GW mean nothing, but in this last year, they have given me something to write for. More than that, being a member of GW has put my writing into context. I realise that there are a whole range of writers out there. Some are excellent, some are okay, and some are downright awful. I’m aiming for excellent but have more than a fair way to go.
I’ve learned from kind and constructive comments on my work where my weaknesses lie. Working on these issues has hopefully improved my writing. I’ve learned I can only write poetry that approaches acceptable when I have something important to write about. It’s not within my comfort zone, and no matter how hard I try, competence always seems to be at least one step away. I’ve learned that the most important opinion is my own – influenced by others or not. If I’m unhappy with something, that’s the most important thing.
A very sincere thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to review. It is down to you that I now have the confidence to submit things into what Gerard calls ‘the real world.’ No luck yet, but I’ve told myself it’s only a matter of time and persistence.
Great Writing is not just about submitting work. It’s a show case where members and none members come to read. I’d approximate I’ve read ninety-nine percent of what has been posted in the Short Story, Poetry, Not News, Scripts, Comedy, Non-fiction and Kids forums since I’ve been a member. I’ve laughed, cried, sighed in disgust, been jealous, wished I’d never started reading something, challenged, educated, been haunted by pieces when I’ve gone to bed, been angry, depressed, cheered up. You name it, I’ve had the reaction. But mainly I’ve learned. I decided early on that if I read something, I’d do the writer the courtesy of leaving a review. This is often harder than it sounds. Excellent pieces are easy, awful pieces aren’t too hard, but challenging and mediocre pieces take work. In thinking about and reviewing pieces, especially the challenging ones, I think I’ve learned more about my own writing. Thinking hard about how other writers ply their craft can only impact on how you go about it. Reviewing can be hard and intimidating, but it is something that a lot of us could do a lot more of and benefit from.
Something I would have poured scorn on a year ago: virtual or online friends. There was no way I was going to make virtual friends – but I think I have. Writing opens up something of ourselves that we usually choose to keep hidden. We all share, to some extent or another, emotions and opinions that are usually safely locked away in the subconscious with all the raving imps of doubts, fears, loves etc. In doing so, we open ourselves up, just a little, in a way we might not with others who are close to us.
Great Writing – the online writing community. My thanks to the faceless ed and nascent. Ta very much.
|
Written by johniebg (553 comments posted) 9th September 2007 | In the words of a great man: "So say we all!" I found GW the same way: by accident and what I write has improved considerably with the great reviews from people like yourself and BBS. I think the quality or your reviews is being able to quantify the good and bad of an essay in just a few words. I guess that comes from being a teacher. The first serious item of fiction I posted here was 'a day in the life of' and your review of that will stay with me for all my days - and that surely counts for something. Personally I think your story writing will only truly flourish when you drop this fascination with poetry. For my mind poetry is victorian, our minds seek affirmation through it because it was how we were raised - but the truly contemporary expression of self is in prose and we can create all kinds of wonderful ... Your best short story for my mind was the one based on a personal experience ... I loved the end where they victim popped up in the guys house but thought the actual payback was a little hollywood. You could have got a great deal more from what might have resulted from compassion. Enjoy and looking forward to bumping into you here often. | Written by Lizzy (828 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | Thanks Phil Both for writing that, and all you've written, (except for the poetry and the wife Lisa, mine is a Hubby David) applies to me. I'd also like to thank you for all the reviews you've written, not just about my work but those about others which I find well written and constructive. Lizzy | Hi Phil Written by jean.day (2366 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | I too have so much to thank you for. Not only the reviews, but the on-line friendship and support. I thought you put into words very well so much of what those of us who tune into this channel regularly think. You are without a doubt the most dedicated reviewer on the site - and I find myself now, only reviewing those who have reviewed me - after the first offering, which is, I suppose, a much more selfish way of dealing with the situation. And you write meaningly reviews - whether they are positive of negative. And a special thanks for reviewing all of my last play. So well done and keep it going. | Hi Phil Written by gshelme (152 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | A good, honest piece of work. Like the others I too appreciate your comments on my work. I think the fact that you had a dry spell not long ago and have come out fighting proves you have what it takes to be a successful writer. I don't write or review on Gw anymore, but I do read new stuff everyday so I am looking forward to your future pieces. Gill | Thanks Phil Written by William87 (30 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | Just came on to thank you aswell Phil. It's great to get reviews on this site, even if the piece is bad, it's still nice to know why, what went wrong and what needs work. Also nice to read this text. I got to know a bit of your background. /William | Written by coosh (923 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | | Looking at your review count, you can hardly be accused of lack of input or familiarity with the contributors to this site - and your motivations and analysis make an interesting read. My thanks to you for your feedback, your fabulous phlegm and your bionic milkwoman. | Written by Seagull (174 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | You were the first person to review the first piece I posted; but I guess a lot of, if not most, other members could make the same claim. I wish I had the same diligence in revieving work as your good self. Like you I stumbled across GW. Like you I also had (have) hopes of being a writer who gets paid for writing. This was a very honest piece that will resonate with a lot of people. So, thanks for it. And thanks also for all your hard work. Cheers Chris | Written by Seagull (174 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | | of course I meant reviewing, that's not to say that some work also needs reviving!! | Written by Cindersarella (67 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | Thanks Phil for putting perfectly into words what so many of us think. I was introduced to GW by the other half who is avid contributor. With his encouragement I dipped my toe in and submitted my first piece. Ashamedly my contributions to the site (both in submitting my own work and reviewing) are intermittent. However I log on regularly, reading the work of others fills me with inspiration and frustration in equal measures – wishing I could write as so many on this site do. Like the others Phil I’d like to say thanks for the considered reviews you’ve given me, they are always appreciated. I have to agree there really is something special about coming home to those emails informing you that you have a review. Thanks again
| Written by Phil (6963 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | Thanks for the comments. Much appreciated. As far as reviewing goes - I (usually) enjoy it. So thanks for the raw materials. Phil. | Written by Livinginanattic (473 comments posted) 10th September 2007 | I think this piece sums up what GW is all about. When I joined I had done very little in the way of creative writing. I was a complete novice but feel I've learned a lot in the last 9 months, thanks to the insightful reviews from yourself and others. You've put in a terrific commitment to the site and I don't know how you manage to find the time. I'm afraid my own efforts have been far more modest. Thanks for all your advice. Ben | Written by stevetroster (1600 comments posted) 11th September 2007 | Phil, knowing the way that you are, my guess would be that you didn’t post this piece with the intention of receiving reviews but more to whip up a bit of renewed vigor in GW. However, given that you are receiving reviews I can now unabashedly add my own. Amongst the multitude of GW members there are a minority who are active and an even smaller minority who are proactive. Of those, there are so very few of whom I would say “The site would be a sorrier place without them.” There are far too many read and run merchants (hits V’s reviews!!) and there are also those who have a tendency towards the ‘buddy’ review, but I look forward to my Phil reviews because I know that they will always be honest and therefore helpful (and if I don’t receive a Phil review I am left wondering just how bad the piece really was!?!). Keep up the good work, Phil, the site would be a sorrier place without you. Steve.
| Steve: Written by Phil (6963 comments posted) 11th September 2007 | Hits v reviews: there are guests who can't leave reviews - but you're right in what I think you are saying - there are those who post who really ought to give a little more in terms of reviewing - even if it's a basic review. You're also kind of right about my motivations. (But it is good to receive reviews on this) There's another piece over on 'advice from the community' that no-one has commented on. While I don't mind on a personal level, I do wonder why. That was written to provoke a bit of a response. (Perhaps I didn't do a very good job.) It is a little less relevant now than when I posted - things have changed a little. Thanks for reading Phil
| Meta-GW Written by Fledermaus (3490 comments posted) 11th September 2007 | Hi Phil. Considering your post in the advice from the community section, I guessed this was a positive version of the same thing. I must say GW is the greatest creative writing site I have found so far. I've actually been looking for it for a long time, not sure if it existed, but as the About Us section says, it was appearantly founded by the survivors of the BBC's Get Writing close-down. I'm curious who those are, as I only recognize one username and that one hasn't posted for a long, long time. Anyhow, I think this is a very worthy (and independent!) succesor. As for the reviews: The spirit will come back, I'm sure.  | Written by anorwegianwood (278 comments posted) 12th September 2007 | I guess it's mostly all been said by now. But I would also like to say thank you for putting these thoughts into words. A lot of us share them. ~Claire | Lay down a line Written by John_O (150 comments posted) 13th September 2007 | Hi Phil it is a seriously addictive activity, post a piece and wait to see if someone will write a crit, the high when it is liked, the low when it is panned. But if it is fairly panned then we learn and grow from the experience. An interesting, and perhaps disturbing piece of news, for all of us who harbour a desire to see our masterwork in print some day. I sent a query letter to an American agent and I mentionned posting work on the GW site. Her reply warned me that publishers regarded anything 'published' online as 'tainted'. Now I have never had this comment from any agent I have approached on this side of the water but it is disturbing. Perhaps we should all only use a running title for online work and use a different title when submitting to an agent/publisher. That aside we write because we enjoy it and read for the same reason. Long live GW John | Written by Gill21 (566 comments posted) 21st September 2007 | | I could post a lengthy reply, however i feel it's all been said; mostly by you (plus i already replied to your piece in the community section). A wonderful and poignant read. Thanks Phil. Let's hope we all continue to get something out of GW. | From Josie Written by Josie (2847 comments posted) 23rd September 2007 | | Usually last in the line but what I tell you is heartfelt: I agree with all that has been said, and I know for certain that if it were not for the enciouragement and support of the GW readers, I probably would not have written so much. I do try to give honest reviews, but I think you all know I find it hard to say "Well done" to material which makes me feel thoroughly depressed, or which (fool that I am) I don't quite understand. ha ha. Nevertheless, I do try to say something, if only to point out that the layout of poetry should be - - - - - ! To conclude: Well said Phil, you just said it before we did. | Written by tpowell (105 comments posted) 28th September 2007 | I'm very new to this site but have found GW to be both very addictive and very helpful. I've tried to post honest and thoughtful reviews of other peoples work and am very grateful to the people who have taken the time to review mine. Writing can be a very lonely existence and like you I only had an audience of one before stumbling across GW. I look forward to reading and reviewing and posting lots more work in the future. Tracey | Caveat Written by gerardconnolly (1186 comments posted) 10th October 2007 | Handsomely put, Phil. You are surely correct to congratulate GW for its tutelage; but to beware not to confuse it with the real world. Out there is a much more brutal and unforgiving place. I once knew an editor who thought the best way to encourage young writers was to hang them out of the seventh floor of Admiralty Warf by their ankles and threaten their families. He was much respected. Over four hundred people attended his retirement party. Use GW for the valuable resourse it is; but be careful not to become addicted. Being a writer is utterly different and ninety percent of the time is spent doing things you have little time for. My compliments to you. Slante! Nonetheless I am glad to see you prosper. I agree with all you outline above and wish you well. | Watto Phil Written by BrianRobertNeal (1195 comments posted) 13th October 2007 | It's all been said. At time I thought you must be my alter ego more or me yours as share many of your thoughts on this subject. Thanks for all your time and comments, Brian
|
Only registered users can rate and write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |