Acres of newsprint on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann now means that one in three UK tabloid readers believe themselves to have a greater knowledge of forensic science than the Portuguese police. Staff tea-breaks in supermarkets, normally occupied by highly complex negotiations over rotas, have descended into slanging matches on the double-stranded structure of DNA and how long a battery-operated Bagpuss can be detained without charge.
The Sun’s bestselling Pop-Up Book of DIY Crime Scene Investigation, entitled ‘Solve Your Own Murder’, has been a soaraway hit, with its free inflatable corpse of Jordan, an industrial pneumatic pump and a set of adjustable crampons. A readers’ poll in the Daily Mail revealed that evidence in the McCann’s hire car would not affect house prices, outside parts of rural Leicestershire.
“DNA is like a brick wall,” explained Andy, an Express pebble-dasher from Lewisham. “Each one is deceptively non-identical. Roughly the size of a dewdrop on a gnat’s knob. But with the same properties as pollen. One gust o’ wind can blow it fousands o’ miles. This Pot Noodle could contain the living organisms of an adulterous Mullah in Casablanca. Not enough for a conviction, because it’s sweet and sour pork - but he’d certainly be a formal suspect.”
Elsewhere, suggestions that the GPs had doctored a key image of their daughter were described by Fleet Street as "outrageous". “What sort of scum would retouch a photo for their own personal benefit?” said the editor of the Sport. “Mind you, who’d o’ thought Marc Bolan would turn up working as a crash test dummy at Kwit-Fit... and give us the exclusive in person.”
|
Hi Coosh Written by jean.day (2279 comments posted) 12th September 2007 |
| Well said. I'm almost scared to read the news these days. It must also be so easy to incriminate people without them knowing it. You just have to put something they touched somewhere near a place you intend to commit a crime, and their DNA will be there for the police to find. |
Written by coosh (867 comments posted) 12th September 2007 |
Perhaps there is a warrant out for your arrest right now, Jean, in Turkey, with the rest of the bridge club, including Pat of the Migraines. Maybe it's just me, but the more I read about "evidence" in this story, the more confused I get. Because of the time factor with the hire car, DNA off hairs and flakes of skin will have no effect on the case, depending on the volume, but if it's off blood and bodily fluids it will be significant, depending on the percentage match. As Portuguese law prohibits the police from revealing information about an ongoing case, the standard procedure for Portuguese journalists is to use information leaked from police sources, with varying degrees of reliability. So, in the end, we know bugger all. Except, of course, that it's all very serious. |
DNA - do not argue Written by John_O (140 comments posted) 14th September 2007 |
Hi Coosh if the filth say they've got your DNA then that's it, case closed, or so the tabloids would have us believe. Its not. Familial DNA, unless a 100% match, proves nothing. And then there's the contamination problem, the degradation problem...... I think its time the press found a new person or persons to hound and let the proper course of justice take whatever time is necessary to resolve the issue. Glass of port Coosh ? John_O |
Written by stevetroster (1549 comments posted) 14th September 2007 |
An unpleasant issue but a wonderful and insightful delivery. “This Pot Noodle could contain the living organisms of an adulterous Mullah in Casablanca. Not enough for a conviction, because it’s sweet and sour pork - but he’d certainly be a formal suspect.” Quite brilliant!! Best wishes, Steve.
|
scary Written by fellpony (1608 comments posted) 14th September 2007 |
| Everywhere I went, in every shop in Carlisle yesterday, there were vociferous ladies expressing opinions on the McCann case and on the parents. I got angry, you got funny. I wish I could do it so well, it would be much better for my blood pressure. Cheers! |
ps Written by fellpony (1608 comments posted) 14th September 2007 |
| It was the "set of adjustable crampons" that got me giggling. No idea why. Masterly. |
Written by coosh (867 comments posted) 15th September 2007 |
You bring the port, John_O, I'll bring the surgical gloves. Many thanks. Cheers, Steve, although naturally it depends on when you add the boiling water... Yes, fellpony, that's more angle I was coming from... All we know is that the Portuguese authorities need sufficient evidence to bring charges. The composition and significance of this evidence is a mystery to most of us... except, of course, Mike and Tina down the Nag's Head, who have suddenly become conversant in the complexities of forensics and how they relate to Portuguese law in this specific case. Scaling the North Face of Jordan requires serious mountaineering gear... this isn't some afternoon jaunt over Helvellyn. Many thanks. |
Now I see Written by fellpony (1608 comments posted) 15th September 2007 |
| BOOM BOOM ... all those readers being blown to Kingdom Come (if you'll pardon the expression) as the pointy bits of the adjustable crampons - or as I first typed it, cadjustable rampons - puncture the pointy bits of the highly pneumatic corpse. WAHAHA. What a fate, and richly deserved. I'm off to buy me an umbrella in case the bits land too close. |
Written by Phil (6713 comments posted) 15th September 2007 |
Remember Reggie Bolovski from The Young Ones? This line: Not enough for a conviction, because it’s sweet and sour pork - but he’d certainly be a formal suspect.” Is pure him. Enjoyed - although I thought you went easy on Daily Mail readers. Could this unite our country in a way that hasn't been seen since St Di popped her cloggs? I sincerely hope not. Horrific case, load of bollocks talked about it, very sad. Cracking piece. Phil |
Written by Livinginanattic (456 comments posted) 16th September 2007 |
Great piece, with some terrific lines. Round my way we've become experts at psychology! Either it's a total fit-up or they're complete psychopaths. It worries me that all the press coverage in both countries will make it impossible for them to get a fair trial. |
Written by coosh (867 comments posted) 16th September 2007 |
You've mentioned Reggie Balowski before in a review, Phil... will have to dig him out again sometime, there was a whole family of them, as I recall. Without concrete evidence or a confession, this could end up splitting the country - the increasing overload of dubious information seems to detract more and more from the actual tragedy. Many thanks. Exactly, Livinginanattic, if there is a trial, that would be naturally be part of their defence. People are already weighing up the book sales and film rights. Many thanks for the feedback.
|
Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3352 comments posted) 18th September 2007 |
I couldn't hope to match your surreal approach to it so wasn't sure whether to post. The best way to deal with a story like this is with a huge dollop of surreal nuttiness,and who'd have thought Marc Bolan would be working at Kwik-fit, they should change their slogan to "we can get it on, for you" cheers Jane |
Written by coosh (867 comments posted) 18th September 2007 |
Glad you did post - at the moment this case is becoming increasingly surreal in itself, without the help of satirists. Marc only works week-ends, fitting the diamond star haloes on the hub-caps. Many thanks. |
Only registered users can rate and write comments.
Please login or register.