Sometime last week I was sat on the local Esporta couch drinking a coffee and watching Sky news. As you commonly find these days the TV was muted but with hesitant subtitles crawling along the base of the screen – either created by some very clever piece of software or furiously tapping touch typist. I am going with the former on account of the phonetic errors you could only imagine being made by software.
The focus of the news was what appeared to be a press statement by Oprah Winfrey, which turned out to be a press conference headed by Oprah. The focus of the conference was the fact that several girls within the Oprah school of excellence had been allegedly sexually abused by a 'dorm matron'. During the course of the conference you got a sense that there was little doubt that the girls claims were true although it did not seem anything legal was under way. It also soon became apparent that the school in question was based in Africa and the school seemed exclusively for young black African girls. My apologies if I am mistaken.
Oprah was front and centre for a long time, I guess it was a slow news day. I sat there for the majority of my lunch hour watching Oprah's confidently earnest face while reading the subtitled dialogue. There was much about how they were going to make things right, had fired everyone, felt tortured and let down, rehired and changed policy and were offering counselling to the girls.
And then she moved onto the killer statement. Which was to declare that her faith dictated she believed everything happens for a reason and that this will somehow make these girls better people.
I think given a choice these girls would probably have preferred to become better people by some route other than sexual abuse, and by the way this happening for a reason? Are we saying god sanctioned the sexual abuse so that they could achieve better grades and succeed in life? Because if that is the case there is something really wrong with whichever faith sits close to the Oprah heart and questionable moral barometer - considering that Oprah Winfrey is a hugely influential female media star watched by a nation with over 600 million American natives, 540 million of which claim the same spiritual faith.
So ... today I was sitting at home waiting for the effects of an allergic reaction to wear off when the BBC's latest scare campaign presented itself on the TV. This hot on the heels of last weeks 'we are all going to die from cancer especially you meat eaters'. This weeks headline was that everyone is an alcoholic and about to die from an illness that is not detectable until your liver functions start to stutter and you begin vomiting blood. Of course they had a blood vomiting citizen on hand to interview, identity hidden to protect her daughter, who was also in frame although blurred while merrily playing on some swings.
Then we switched to the anti drinking lobbyists, who universally seemed haunted and under nourished. They earnestly announced that they consider the best course of action to resolve a nations alcoholism is to raise drinking taxes. As alcohol in this modern day is cheaper that it was twenty years ago.
Of course they were very selective on which drinks they showed as being cheaper, of which obviously did not include Guinness nor Magners nor Bulmers, nor any lager. They were also very elusive about where they got their alcohol from. Aunty Beeb did manage to have the presenter talking over a white table of vague advertisement free bottles with no specific labels on view. But with a blood red wine spilt and laced between the bottles.
Having studied alcoholism to benchmark my own drinking habits and assist the good lady Priddeesh with a recent study project, I can confidently state that if you take the clinical definition of an 'alcoholic' and apply it to your average Joan or Jo Blow then indeed a vast majority of this countries population are alcoholic. But that is of course missing the point. We may be drinking more but most of us are not drinking from a compulsive need to quench an all consuming addiction.
We are drinking because of a a psychological reaction. A reaction to the incessant static of a misdirected government struggling to manage a society falling apart at its violent seams. We drink as a reaction to the administrative and decision making incompetence of these same governmental institutions that are run by over educated socially inept civil servants. Who increasingly seem to be led and dictated to by the good old US of A who universally hold faith before all else and present people like Oprah as moral lynchpins for their own culture.
|
Good value Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3136 comments posted) 14th November 2007 | Like the special deals for drink, you have a two for one offer,here. Two rants for the price of one. I admit to being far more upset about the first, while our irrational,love/hate relationship with alcohol just raises a wry smile as it never dares address the problem; only the sypmptoms, for financial and national reasons. I'm glad someone has highlighted the unpleasant side Oprah. I would go further and say her influence is dangerous and sinister. And you have shown her up wonderfully with your percerptive arguement. It is, as I'm sure you will know, typical of relgious platitudes which sound glib and plausible but the initial premise which it is based on, is illogical and morally bankrupt. Your arguement was concise and flawless and made her words sound ridiculous. As for alcohol. It is not the price or availability but our [British] attitude to it tht is wrong, and you have summed up the causes very well. It's there because "nature abhors a vacuum" It fills the vacuum created by the alienation fostered by the lack of a culture or any social adhesion.I have felt more relaxed walking around Barcleona of evening than Nottinham centre. Interested to see where your mind takes you next jane
| Written by Fledermaus (3159 comments posted) 14th November 2007 | Who bothers about Oprah Winfrey? Or her strange attitude towards Africa. I remember she once said she was trying to find out where her ancestors came from and she hoped they were Zulu... Sorry to disappoint mrs. Winfrey, but considering African-American history, the chances she is Zulu are as large as those of her being Japanese. Does she even know the history of the African-Americans, let alone Africa itself? I supose she must have expressed herself in an unlucky way in the programme you watched, for as far as I know she had similar experiences in her own youth. She isn't bright, but I can hardly imagine she doesn't get it that those people destroyed these girls' lives. As for the alcohol part. I'm not too sure what my own opinions are on that. Some people seem to enjoy alcohol. Yet on the other hand, some people also enjoy marihuana and mushrooms or even worse things... btw. 600 million native Americans? Are there even 600 million people in the Americas? | Written by Phil (6387 comments posted) 14th November 2007 | I can do little else but echo Jane's perceptive comments. Oprah Winfrey's comments about it all happening for a reason resonant very highly with me. It was comments like this that gave rise to my first doubts, at the age of about ten, about the religion I grew up with - but that's another story. My wife, not one to commit either way on religion made me laught the other day. We were watching a news story about the fires in California. There was an interview with a local evacuee who said something like: 'I just thank god we all got out in time. Thank you Jesus.' (Never mind the frazzled dead.) My wife commented: 'God must have been in a good mood then.' As for alcohol: is it just another way to raise funds from a gullible public who believe too much they read in the Mail and Express? Alcohol isn't a price problem, it is, as you say, a problem of society. How much we can pin on the Yanks for that, I'm not sure, but they've got away with so much else, why not. Besides, I'm not sure we do have a worse attitude to alcohol than our European neighbours. From what I saw in Corfu this summer, drink driving - I should say drunken driving - is common and acceptable there. I wonder what's next? Breathing? Over the last year I've witnessed the community I work in deal with criminality by throwing immense amounts of money at a problem created by two or three individuals. It hasn't and won't solve the problem because the individuals concerned do not consider themselves touched by what has been done. Actually, I don't think they're touched by much to be honest. When they are a little older, they'll probably be wrecked in Bolton town centre, pissing in doorways and sticking a glass in someone's face. Modern Britain or much as it ever was? I can trace back a change in society (not that it existed then - apparently) to the early Thatcher years. I admit, I was young, but even then I sensed a feel for community evaporate and a pursuit of self-satisfaction with no consideration for others take over. What you sow, so shall you reap? To say I had little to add, I've gone on a bit. Apologies. I blame the fact I can't settle to write anything of my own at the moment. Good piece. Phil. | Written by johniebg (538 comments posted) 14th November 2007 | yes Mr fledermaus is correct, the population of America is about 300 million, so thats only 270 Oprah faithful. Checking my sources I see the figure I got was the world wide viewing figure for last years Superbowl, not sure how that got into the mix, but seems the adage: 'never trust a human when it comes to fact' is right. Pleased this seems to have struck a chord, sometimes when you sit scandalised you worry it is just you. | Hi Johnnie Written by jean.day (2196 comments posted) 15th November 2007 | I sort of hesitate to respond to this one, because I am going to be in a minority opinion here. I like Oprah. Granted I haven't watched her show for several years, and she may have changed in the meantime, but it would be my guess that the subtitle you are quoting was not quite what she said or how she said it. She never came across as a fundamentalist Christian in her programme and although she had a religion of some sort, she was very willing to let other people put their points of view. She was abused as a child - and what she might have said was that, as awful as it is, it needn't ruin one's life - as she managed to make a life for herself despite her terrible childhood. I think she made such an emormous difference to the way black people in America are viewed, especially black women. She does a lot of good with her millions - and despite having not been paying attention to her school - which of course she must take responsiblity for - I would say overall she does more good than harm in the world. As far as the alcohol bit goes, I drink because it makes me feel better and tastes good. Occasionally I try to stop drinking - but have not yet found any other substance that takes me from being tired and fed up to being content. You don't have to drink vast amounts to get the benefit, but I think the world would be a sadder place without alcohol. Certainly raising the price won't stop most people drinking. Lowering the allowed level for driving might have an effect - as it does in Scandanavia - but I daresay people would just drink more at home rather than when they are out. | Written by johniebg (538 comments posted) 15th November 2007 | Well Jean that was a well stated POV. Do not take the following personally, it is a generic response not directed at you: Oprah states her belief as 'spiritual' although this has not always been the case. Occuring in the years since 9/11 where America's Christian community seems to have take a stranglehold on the emotional collective of American minds - and anyone with political aspirations. Oprah's biography does state that she was raped as a nine year old and she is indeed a succesful women, but so are many women that were not raped, if that was indeed the case. In my lifetime I have known several women that were sexually and physcially abused as children and I can categorically state that not in one occasion did it make them better people nor drive them onto success, instead it haunted them and restricted their adult lives quite badly. I may have misunderstood and misinterpreted what was flashed before me on the screen, but if we cannot trust my first hand account of the information what can we trust - a spiritual faith based on hand me down myths 2000 years old?
| Written by Lizzy (781 comments posted) 16th November 2007 | I think you made your points very well. Lizzy |
Only registered users can rate and write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |