Great Writing - Home > Short S. > The Catcher in the What?
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1376 guests online and 5 members online
Shorts
The Catcher in the What?
By ianhobsonuk
16 December 2007
 

 

If you've read J. D. Salinger's 'The Catcher in the Rye', then this might make some sense. If not, I'd advise you to read something else.


 

©2004 Ian Hobson


I've just been reading old J. D. Salinger's 'The Catcher in the Rye'. I'm about half way through. I know it's supposed to be a really good book and all - and all and all and all, for Chrissake - and it does have some amusing bits in it. Like when Holden - he's the main character in the story - wakes up one of his fellow students - the one who doesn’t clean his teeth properly - to ask him what the routine is for joining a monastery. But, I don't really see what all the fuss is about. Perhaps in its day - it was first published in about 1945 - it was pretty cool. Did they say 'pretty cool' back in 1945? I don't know. Maybe they just said 'the bee's knees' and crap like that.


Anyway, so far, I wouldn't put in the top ten books I've ever read; but perhaps I should finish reading it before I decide. Though maybe I'm just one of those morons old J. D. keeps talking about and that's why I don't see why the book's so great. I don't think I'm a moron though. I think I'm pretty smart. At least, my friends tell me I'm pretty smart. Not that I have that many friends. But most of those that I have say I'm pretty smart. Those that don't aren’t really my friends. I just let them think that they're my friends, but they're not. They're just morons. I mean real morons. Like this guy at work who keeps borrowing my newspaper. You'd think he'd buy one of his own instead of borrowing mine all the time. Goddam moron.


Anyway, my wife, she read the book a month or two back, she says I should pretend to be a young person when I'm reading it. That way I'll understand it better, you know, see it from Holden's point of view and all. In the book, he's about seventeen and he's just been thrown out of high school and all. Is that what they call school for seventeen-year-olds in the US? High school? I think it is, or maybe it's college. I live in Yorkshire in the UK. When I was seventeen, I was working, serving an engineering apprenticeship, for Chrissake. Now I'm fifty-three, so that was a long time ago. But I can still remember it. I can still see the faces of some of the other apprentices; the ones that I was in the apprentice school with. Now most of them really were morons.


Take this guy Andrew Benson. He was the biggest goddam moron of the lot. He was always going on about his sexual conquests. The rest of us never knew whether to believe him or not. Though he was a year or two older than the rest of us. I don't know why - perhaps it was because he was born before we were – but he was older than the other apprentices. And he was pretty handsome I suppose, old Benson, and definitely in love with himself. That's what made him such a big goddam moron. I hated him. I'd imagine myself walking right up to him and saying 'Hi Benson, ya sonuvabitch,' then smacking him right in the mouth. He wouldn't duck or anything. My fist would just connect with his chin and he'd fall flat on his back and then he'd beg me not to hit him any more. Actually I probably wouldn't have said 'ya sonuvabitch', it sounds a bit too American. Though I did watch a lot of American TV in those days. Still do, well, movies anyway. In those days there were lots of TV westerns, like Bonanza and Wagon Train and The Virginian and all. I think I liked The Virginian best; though my favourite character in it was Trampas.


Anyway, I suppose they weren't all morons, the other apprentices. Some of them were okay. One of them was my best friend. His name was Peter. Old Peter was always broke on account of spending all his money on his scooter. He wasn't a mod or anything; he just liked scooters. I used to share my lunch with him if he couldn’t afford to buy any. I saw him on television a few years ago. He was being interviewed in the street or somewhere, by one of those TV programs that interview people in the street.


Anyway, we were only in the apprentice school for a year. Then we went back to the three engineering companies in the group that employed us. Then we got to work with some real morons. You wouldn't believe some of the old guys; they used to kill me. They were always taking pinches of snuff. One guy used to take a pinch of snuff and then he'd get an itch in his ear and he'd scratch it and end up with snuff in his ear. Another guy used to sing out loud, but he couldn't sing. And he only knew about three words of a song, and he'd just keep singing the same three words over and over, about eight thousand times. I remember when I was in my final year as an apprentice, George, my charge-hand, said to me 'You know, there's now't so queer as folk. Thu's only you and me in this place what's reet… And you're a bit queer.' That's how people talked in Yorkshire in those days. Some people still talk like that. He was okay, old George. I didn't mind working for him, too much.


Anyway, I think my wife was right about needing to be in a young frame of mind and all, when reading The Catcher in the Rye. It's not a very long book - and it'd be a lot shorter if there weren't so many goddam 'and alls' in it. Maybe I'll read a bit more. I've just got to the bit where Holden is about to go on a date and all, after having a conversation about Romeo and Juliet with two nuns. I wonder what the Rye is and who catches what exactly.

Reviews

Written by Fledermaus (3474 comments posted) 16th December 2007
Never read it. But this was an interesting read. Not sure if the main character is actually too confident or self-conscious, but it seems he's still a bit of a teenager. Perhaps he tried pretending to be young a little too hard? 
What is a Rye??
If you really want to hear about it....
Written by Phil (6951 comments posted) 16th December 2007
Holden Caulfield, what a jerk! 
 
Actually, when I was fifteen and read this for the first time - I loved it. I think your wife's right - you really do need to be in a young frame of mind. 
 
Thought you captured the style pretty well and I enjoyed the read very much. You've a never ending stock of pieces if you go down this route. Biography in the style of famous novels. Each chapter a different style. 
 
BTW: At fifteen, after reading Catcher in the Rye, we were required to read To Kill a Mocking Bird. (Harper Lee) You've probably read it, but if not, it really is worth a go. You don't have to pretend to be an adolescent either. 
 
Phil

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3557 comments posted) 17th December 2007
I suppose you are right you do need to have read the book to enjoy your homage. I liked this for the sheer cheek of it, and even more so as you pulled it off well. You got the style of it without overdoing it. 
I must admit it's one of those books I know I should like more than I do. I think that's why your re-working of it made me smile.  
I was taken with Phil's idea for a biography of various pastiches. If you want a real challenge try the style of Hoban's Ridley Walker. 
Good fun 
Jane

Written by Lizzy (827 comments posted) 18th December 2007
Yes, enjoyed this Ian.  
It was one of those books that was required reading at a certain age and you didn't dare say you hadn't read it and even worse that you didn't 'like' it. 
I like Phil's idea too. 
Lizzy

Written by Toad (106 comments posted) 18th December 2007
I liked this a lot. Really reminded me of old JD and old Holden. Their tone was well captured. I did think that in your fourth paragraph the mimicry may have gone a little too far, almost an exact replication of a section in the book, if I recall.  
 
For me, at age 12 or so, Catcher in the Rye was one of the handful of books throughout a lifetime that stands out above the rest as a meaningful, resonating reading experience. Another would be Catch-22 by Joseph Heller. 
 
Thanks for the enjoyable read and nostalgia it evoked! 
Hi, Ian & others ........
Written by Bagheera (683 comments posted) 18th December 2007
Could never understand WHY this pretentious piece of drivel was ever considered "required reading" .... translated into UK terms, what's so fascinating about the 'makeweight' on a cricket team who's always the "Fielder on the Third Man Boundary" ???? :grin :grin  
 
It can only be explained by assuming that the writer (Author? I think not - that's a title which has to be EARNED .....) .... the "writer" found a good PR firm to promote the MS (JK Rowling, does this scenario sound familiar to you????) :sigh

Written by fellpony (1702 comments posted) 18th December 2007
Yes, I loathed Holden C myself but perhaps I was just a touch too old when I read The Catcher in the Rye at 20 years of age - too old and not old enough to "get" the perspective as I would have done at fifteen or thirty. Or maybe not. Like Phil I just thought him a jerk and skipped chunks to find out the end, which felt disappointing. 
 
I felt the language of your piece was a bit too American and teenage - as though your narrator had been overdosing on Salinger, with goddams and Chrissakes and so on everywhere. The mention of Yorkshire and the bit of dialect came as a shock. I wonder if it would work to have a sprinkling of both styles throughout, or whether it would just further confuse?
Thanks
Written by ianhobsonuk (180 comments posted) 24th December 2007
Thanks for the reviews. I had been 'overdosing' and broke off reading to try writing something in the same goddam style, and all. I made up the moron-borrowing-my-newspaper bit, but the rest of it was very close to the truth – I just changed the names. I forget what the Rye was – a field of rye, I think. 
 
Ian
Ian
Written by Josie (2844 comments posted) 30th December 2007
Did you know the following information about this book: 
 
"In 1960, a teacher was fired, and later reinstated, for assigning the novel in class.[15] Between 1961 and 1982, The Catcher in the Rye was the most censored book in high schools and libraries in the United States.[16] In 1981, it was both the most censored book and the second most taught book in public schools in the United States.[17] According to the American Library Association, The Catcher in the Rye was the 13th most frequently challenged book from 1990–2000.[1] It was one of the 10 most challenged books in 2005, and came off the list in 2006.[18]" So, there you have it. Better not to follow the style I would suggest. 
 
Marmite
Written by zmbbw (22 comments posted) 30th December 2007
I might be wrong about this but I think it's correct that in a recent survey Marmite was voted the most loved and the most hated foodstuff in the UK.  
 
Funny that. 
 
I love Marmite. 
 
z

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item