The following was just a fun script I wrote. As you can see, my sense of humor is rather strange.
There is also an image associated with it. http://www.crizcult.com/crizcult/media/1/20071231-deathClown.jpg
The following interview was conducted by my nephew Stone Rather who is currently a journalism student at SPU. He wants to follow in his uncles footsteps and become an extremely popular web publisher so I decided to give him a shot. Criz
Stone: Good morning. Please have a seat.
Death: Thank you.
Stone: Do you need someone to take your sickle?
Death: It’s a Scythe, and no.
Stone: I mean, you call it one thing I call it another.
Death: Look, I have been fighting this linguistic fallacy for centuries. Yes they are used for the same function, but a sickle is much shorter than a scythe. Also, there is a big difference with respect to how intimidating one looks over the other.
Stone: Why do you feel the need to look intimidating?
Death: Well, death is kind of scary, wouldn’t you agree?
Stone: Well—yeah, I suppose so.
Death: How would you like it if death showed up in a clown suit?
Stone: That would be creepy. Would you still be carrying a scythe?
Death: I don’t know, I wouldn’t think so.
Stone: I mean a clown with a scythe would really freak me out, especially if the clown had sad paint on.
Death: Sad paint?
Stone: You know, the painted on frown and tear, and then the scythe on top of that.
Death: I get your point. That would probably be pretty scary. But isn’t the whole death shroud with a scythe pretty scary as well?
Stone: Sure, but the clown thing.
Death: Lets drop the clown thing; I am not going to be wearing a clown outfit any time in the near future, this is the traditional uniform and the idea that it might change to anything else is preposterous. But lets be serious, it isn’t what death wears that is important. I could show up in a Santa suit and the result would be the same, the ending of a life.
Stone: A Santa suit? That would be scary too, especially if the Santa carried a scythe.
Death: You’re really fixated on the Scythe aren’t you. --- Look you’re missing the point. I was just using the Santa suit as an example of what isn’t important.
Stone: But you were the one who brought up looks. The whole intimidation factor you know.
Death: Okay, I admit that there is something to the look, but that isn’t the focus of the job.
Stone: That being?
Death: To kill people.
Stone: Oh yes, with the scythe. Do you actually stab people with your scythe? Do you swing it and bury the blade in someone’s chest?
Death: Actually the scythe is mostly symbolic. All that I really need to do is touch the customer and their spirit leaves them to sit at judgment…
Stone: Judgment??? Let’s not change the subject now. No reason to get all religious on me, separation of church and state you know.
Death: But…
Stone: Back to the scythe, perhaps you use it to slash at your victims? I mean when a situation gets out of hand and you have to take action?
Death: Not really.
Stone: But you could use it if you wanted to right? You do carry it around for a reason?
Death: If you want to put it that way the answer is that I don’t really have a reason for carrying the scythe. I don’t use it to stab people or to slash them. As I said the only thing I have to do to end a life is to touch the customer, so as I have said the scythe is just for looks.
Stone: No need to get testy.
Death: My apologies. I wanted to talk about life after death, not my scythe or what I wear, you know, the important stuff.
Stone: When you get your own show then you can conduct the interview the way you want to. Until then just answer the questions.
Death: There is no need to be short with me.
Stone: You're right, --- I apologize.
Death: No problem --- lets shake on it.
|
Written by Phil (6828 comments posted) 28th January 2008 |
It's difficult to see beyond Pratchett when it comes to Death - but you delivered this pretty well. Even though the ending was pretty well telegraphed - it worked fine. Not a laugh a minute - but certainly amusing. (2nd last line - your should be you're) Phil |
Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3433 comments posted) 2nd February 2008 |
| You have my sympathy, criz. It seems if you use death as a character you are doomed to be compared to Pratchett. The same thing happened to me when I did it and I have never read any Pratchett, so at least I came to this fresh. It was well scripted but could have done with some direction to give it context. It raised smiles rather than laughs.The humour was dependent on character [which you got right] but the character wasn't strong enough, he didn't jump off the page. The stronger the character, the more extreme his reactions and opinions the stronger the humour. Give him a powerful character, lots of flaws, a wild personalilty and he will do all the work for you |
Review of "Interview with Death." Written by TomOBrien (68 comments posted) 4th February 2008 |
I liked it. Made me smile and chuckle out load. Death actually seems to be squirming a little bit. Maybe a squirm of frustration. I'm not familiar with "Pratchett" so no comparison there from me, however, Woody Allen has done an interview of sorts with death. When death comes to him they end up in a long, comical discussion. I think Allen actually talks death out of his mission. Good work. Write on! tom |
Written by coosh (887 comments posted) 5th February 2008 |
| I'd agree with BBS - the character would have probably been more effective had it been more extreme, and the script could have been enhanced with some direction. I liked the idea of running through the various ridiculous costume options, but this could have become increasingly surreal. Or even kinky. A "believable" amusing conversation on which you could build. |
Written by Levi (31 comments posted) 15th February 2008 |
Hey Cool stuff. I disagree with the calls for direction - it's nice to read something where we, the audience, can imagine how something is played out (mannerisms, movements etc) than being told - and I'm sure any actors would feel the same. I will say I was pretty pessimistic when I read the title, expecting something maudlin and pop-gothic, but you got the tone right ... and unfortunately stepped on Mr. Pratchett's toes. But since no-one's accused you of plagerism, take it as a huge compliment! Enjoyed. |
Written by criz (28 comments posted) 19th February 2008 |
Sadly, I haven't read Prachett, I hadn't even heard of him. In fact, I thought that Phil was referencing another writer here on greatwriting, whom I couldn't find. I like writing scripts as I can really concentrate on conversation between characters. It can be very compelling. |
Written by Josie (2823 comments posted) 3rd June 2008 |
| Oh, you should listen to Phil - he will guide you in the right direction! ha ha - Now you really must read Pratchett (with a t in it). You have done a good job with this criz. Very funny. Just a few little things that can be changed: Scythe (it is a tool - doesn't need a capital letter). " if you wanted to right" - you need a dash between to and right as it is a separate thing, and probably a question mark after right? (Meaning - Is that right?) Only little things to change to polish it up, but on the whole you did a good job. |
wow Written by DulcetSprite (2 comments posted) 16th June 2008 |
I really love your sense of humour and writing style! its hard to make me laugh props to you bru |
Only registered users can rate and write comments.
Please login or register.