Great Writing - Home
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1824 guests online and 6 members online
Shorts
Pathetic Bob Discusses Art
By Emmuttmax
12 May 2008
Another chapter from Pathetic Bob's Guide to Self Help. Warning! Bob uses some words considered by some to be crude or foul.

Art

“All art is useless” –Oscar Wilde

Like so many things these days, art has become so over-intellectualized that most humans, being the assholes that you are (see chapter 2), have been suckered into believing only “special” people (academics, gallery owners, critics, dilettantes, etc) know what constitutes “good” art. These sorts of people, of course, have a financial interest in telling you what to like and why you should like it. Mostly, it’s all bullshit.

You are probably wondering, “What the hell does a dog know about art?” That’s a valid question, and I’ll indulge your sorry ass by answering, it the same way 99.9 percent of you humans would: “I don’t know squat about art, but I know what I like.” In order to like art, the first thing you need to know is what art is and is not.

For me, Immanuel Kant and Oscar Wilde provide the best ideas of what art is all about: uselessness. Now, don’t hang a negative connotation on “uselessness;” Kant and Wilde meant that art is “intrinsically final:” its appeal is imaginative and serves no practical purpose except the “cultivation of the human spirit.” For you, art could mean something different; of course, then you would be wrong, and I would be better than you. I joke.

For many humans, art really is a question of “what kind of art can I spend my money on that will make me look like I’m sophisticated and impress other people?” This is where I can help.

Art FAQs

Q. Where can I get the best art bargains?
A. Garage sales, Wal-Mart, any middle school

Q. What are cubism, minimalism, and other modern-art isms?
A. They are special branches of art for people who don’t know how to draw.

Q. What is an Artist?
A. Anyone who has flunked out of college.

Q. Is performance art really an art?
A. Absolutely not. Performance art is pubic masturbation.

Q. What is good art?
A. Good art costs $50,000 or more.

Q. Are “art” and “craft” the same.
A. No. Craftspeople actually make a living.

I’ll end this chapter with a quote from G.K. Chesterton:
“Art, like morality, consists in drawing the line somewhere.”

Chapter 14 summary:
Art is useless, Useless is good, Kant and Wilde know their art, Draw a line


Reviews

Written by Phil (7014 comments posted) 12th May 2008
A good read - and a while since I've read a Pathetic Bob piece - but the voice seems to have changed a little. Either that or I find myself in the surreal position of agreeing with an imaginary dog. That makes him less subversive and me just a little madder. 
 
Loved this: 
 
Q. Is performance art really an art? 
A. Absolutely not. Performance art is pubic masturbation. 
 
 
and this: 
 
I’ll end this chapter with a quote from G.K. Chesterton: 
“Art, like morality, consists in drawing the line somewhere.” 
 
Phil
Enjoyed!
Written by Nick (163 comments posted) 12th May 2008
Funny stuff this - particularly liked the line "what is Cubism...."  
 
I think i need to show this to my friend who believes he's an artist but the general consensus is he's just full of sh*t - nice bloke otherwise!! 
 
I'll be interested to see what bob has to say next - I'd like to hear his thoughts on over hyped (but not very good) literature!! 
 
Nick

Written by mia_ms_kim (1057 comments posted) 12th May 2008
Loved it. Very intelligent and perceptive and funny. Puts us in our place. I liked every line.  
 
But I have to agree with Phil. Bob doesn't sound authentic here. He is too acid, too clever, and knows a little too much, quoting Kant and Wilde etc. So the reader senses the writer is putting words in Bob's mouth or he is speaking through the character, rather than letting Bob speak for himself.  
 
Perhaps you can say evreything you want to say by bringing Bob's human owner (Mike?) in, and have him try to teach art to Bob, and between their interaction Bob's doggy insight can shine the light on the absurdity of humans. Or maybe Bob can have doggy equivalents of Kant and Wilde and other canine thinkers in his world, who help him to come to the conclusion.  
 
I think what's said in this piece must be said, but it should be said while preserving the integrity of Bob's character. Anyway, really enjoyed again. 
Mia 8)

Written by Emmuttmax (203 comments posted) 12th May 2008
Phil, Nick, and Mia, 
 
Thanks so much for your comments. Bob's "voice" is different in his book, than in some of the Pathetic Bob stories. Bob is, and has always been, a rather strange dog. He is a smart ass, and my confidant. He is also my alter ego and my beloved friend. 
 
One day, I'll post the story of how PB started out.

Written by mia_ms_kim (1057 comments posted) 12th May 2008
Oops! Bob appears in different books? I thought they were all one and the same book! Now, that understanding makes the chapter look different. 
Mia 8)

Written by TwistedTales (548 comments posted) 14th May 2008
A definite shift in the POV as Phil said. This was no where close to your earlier Bob stories, because I think for one, there is no story as such, its more of an opinion. By the way I loved the one in the restaurant the best. This looks more like it should be part of the non-fiction section. Enjoyable nonetheless. 
 
Regards, 
TT  
 

Written by Fledermaus (3506 comments posted) 16th May 2008
A nice observation many would agree with. I was once more or less forced by some friends to join them in a visit to a modern art gallery, whereupon I clearly gave my opinion on the works. They didn't ask me to visit a modern art gallery since :p  
For me the best art is from before 1800 and the same probably goes for literature... At least things that are still considered art after 200 years have proven that they are art. 
 
I don't see the connection with pathetic Bob here though... :?

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item