|
By hebe
|
|
10 August 2008 |
I sincerely hope that Descartes will not be offended.
We dream;
Therefore, We are.
We are;
Therefore, We dream.
Dreamers and Dreams
Depend upon All
For being.
Dreams become more
Than the Dreamers,
Who gave them form.
Inescapable,
Inseparable,
Unfathomable.
Hope eternal,
Dream on!
|
Written by Phil (7001 comments posted) 10th August 2008 | Sorry, hebe. I don't follow the logic of this one. I understand the original, but the leap in logic here defies me. Could, of course, just be my lack of imagination.
Phil |
Written by hebe (17 comments posted) 10th August 2008 | | Think beyond Descartes to C. G. Jung and Martin Luther King. |
Written by Phil (7001 comments posted) 10th August 2008 | I left Jung on a train to Lincoln many years ago. Had to pay a fortune at the library for a new hardback copy.
See, it was lack of imagination. The MLK example really fits this well. The penny drops. Apologies for my initial denseness!
I quite like it, though the third and fourth are lacking a little something for me - perhaps the rhythm that the rest has.
Phil |
Written by hebe (17 comments posted) 10th August 2008 | The fourth stanza flows better without "synergism." Since "Synergism" is the title, I don't need to wave a sign at the end.
hebe
|
Only registered users can rate and write comments.
Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |
Previous item
