Great Writing - Home > Not News > The Placebo Effect.
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1541 guests online and 3 members online
Not News
The Placebo Effect.
By wltshr
04 September 2008

I'm really not sure about this. I think it could have been structured so much better. Constructive reviews please. Indeed, all and any reviews welcome as ever.

Dr Julius Wenham, Head of Psychiatry at Cambridge University, announced today the end of a forty year research project.

“It has proved an enormous success.” declared Dr Wenham, “Beyond our wildest imaginings.”

“Forty years ago Psychiatry, certainly the most exciting medical science of the twentieth century, was being overshadowed by, of all things, surgery. Surgeons! Barbers not physicians! Christian Barnard was making surgery sexy and by crikey, we didn’t like it. Admittedly, we psychiatrists were getting a little complacent. At seminars we’d all be wearing half moon glasses and matching bow ties and some of us recognised that something had to be done.

We decided to effect research into gullibility. We dared to dream, and being psychiatrists we knew what it meant. We would invent a completely bogus mental illness, announce the symptoms to the world and wait for the results. Fantastic. Before we knew it we had literally hundreds of new patients, all exhibiting perfectly the symptoms we had told them to exhibit. We tried again. Another mythical illness. Again. Fabulous success.

Every single illness we invented and documented, within weeks of publication, hundreds, perhaps thousands, of new patients. Private practice was booming for all.

However, It has been decided, in committee, predominantly by the older Freudian members, (you’ll never convince the Jung ones), to announce to the world that the research has been a resounding success, we have proved the Theory of Gullibility beyond all expectations. Our gravy train cannot continue for ever and our patients must return to their normal stations in life.

To list and explain but a few of our deceptions, all in the name of science of course.

OCD – Just a way of labelling the fastidious. They make wonderful housekeepers you know.

PTSD – We never thought we’d get away with this one. Millions of people returned from two world wars, and millions more suffered at home, and yes, there were occasional mental health casualties, but really...

ME – We announced this during the mid-eighties. A perfect excuse for potential go-getters who would have liked to be Yuppies but just couldn’t make it. We thought about calling it CBA (Can’t be arsed), but realised that our research may be discovered early.

ADHD –There have always been rude, obnoxious kids with no discipline and no respect, but society punished that sort of behaviour. ADHD proved the perfect excuse for useless parents.

I could mention Bulimia, Anorexia, and many others, of course, but now the cat is out of the bag, presumably, I don’t need to.

On behalf of the Royal Society I’d like to apologise to all the gullible members of society who may have been taken in and now realise that their “illnesses” were indeed a cruel invention but they have been rewarded enough. Years of being pandered to and state funded.

We decided to bring the research to a close once we realised how far this experiment had taken society away from the Britain of the stoical stiff upper lip. I suggest that all those who believe they suffer from any of the above should watch “Zulu” or read the Band of Brothers speech from Henry V.”

Even though this research experiment has been brought to a successful conclusion Dr Wenham will remain in charge of Psychatric research at Cambridge and insists that no further experimentation into the Theory of Gullibility will take place.

Reviews
Ha! Ha! Ha!
Written by Katanga (1515 comments posted) 4th September 2008
Very well written and disturbingly, probably closer to the truth than one would care to admit in mixed company! 
 
I heard a good one the other day: 
 
Man goes to a psychiatrist dressed in a pointy hat, blue naval jacket, brass buttons, arm in a sling. 
 
The Psychiatrist looks up wearily, "Yes?" 
 
"Doctor, I keep thinking I'm Adolph Hitler!" 
 
"Surely you mean Napoleon?" 
 
"No, no, no - I AM Napoleon!" 
 
Cheers! 
 
John

Written by Lizzy (828 comments posted) 4th September 2008
Yes I liked this. Once something has been given a name its always easier to treat isn't it? 
When I was teaching we had a number of children diagnosed with ADHD, once they were given the Ritalin all was well but heaven help us if they forgot to take it! 
 
Do you remember that disorder some years ago when some people had a complete allergy syndrome and had to live in plastic bubbles. Apparently something to do with modern life. I think your psychiatrists had something to do with that. 
Lizzy

Written by wltshr (352 comments posted) 4th September 2008
John: Thanks for reviewing. I'm glad you enjoyed it. Your joke? Terrible. 
 
Lizzy: Years ago, when everything was in black and white, and loon pants were de rigueur, I worked in a hostel in Stoke Newington for drug addicts. One particular resident was in a much worse state than any of the others. He was addicted to Ritalin. Drugs for behavioural problems? Seems a lazy and dangerous option to me. Plastic bubbles? I wishe the Jade Goodys, Jordans, and Kerry Katonas of this world lived in them. 
 
Regards 
 
Wltshr
You mean this is fiction??
Written by Northern-nana (47 comments posted) 4th September 2008
You almost had me convinced there! I almost thought my compulsive cushion plumping, my fear of the great outdoors, and my utter conviction that the world was going to end tomorrow was all in my mind. Thank goodness I realised in time.

Written by Fledermaus (3490 comments posted) 4th September 2008
It seems that in psychiatry they nowadays focus ever more on behaviour therapy rather than medicine alone, so I guess they are coming back from the idea that psychiatric problems are to be treated as medical problems. 
 
The disorders you mention are serious psychiatric problems, but I do think that with the right therapy (rather than chemically influencing people's neurotransmitters) many people could be cured. It's simple behaviourism: Change the behaviour and you'll change the brain. 
 
So in a way you are correct: Those syndromes are all inside people's minds. The problem though is that to get it out, one may need a hand, as it requires a tremendous lot of discipline if people want to get rid of such disorders all by themselves.
Here! Here!
Written by Katanga (1515 comments posted) 4th September 2008
Despite my flippancy and bad joke above, I take these things very seriously. I've been there, on the fringes. 
 
I applaud Fledermaus's comment above. 
 
A review that needed stating - I was too lazy . . .  
 
Cheers! 
 
John X

Written by mia_ms_kim (1057 comments posted) 4th September 2008
This piece was witty and funny, and I could see how some of us can work ourselves up into believing we have some major disorder when it may just be the case of lacking self-discipline. 
 
However I know good people with painful mental disorders beyond their control, including OCD and others. Even with professional help, it means a long hard road ahead of them and their families. 
 
So this piece left me questionig, if there are many peole who'd like to be diagnosed with mental disorder, in order to validate themselves. eg. to excuse their lack of self-discipline, to gain sympathy and attention etc. 
 
Hmmm... it left me thinking. 
 
Mia 8)

Written by Veronica_Milvus (751 comments posted) 6th September 2008
oooh. The flippancy of this made me flinch. Wait until you get a review from somebody whose life has been ruined by OCD, spent in prison because of ADHD, or wrenched apart by a child who died from anorexia. 
 
They may not seem like real illnesses to you, but you are lucky enough not to have suffered from them. 
 
Barbarously judgemental.
unsafe
Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3567 comments posted) 6th September 2008
I often think the best humour comes out when you don't "play safe" and deliberately poke away at the taste barriers. Having worked in social work I do get this and realised it was a pop at the powerful psychiatry world and not at any one suffering. 
When you do stick your head over the parapet and try something like this you run the risk of being misunderstood but I applaud you for having a go, otherwise we would just have safe acceptable humour like "keeping up appearances" and "Last of the summer wine" The comedic equivalent of mogadon.  
If Fledermaus and Veronica are offended by this I'm relieved they never heard the jokes and quips we used to come up with as social workers I'm sure we would have been locked away in some PC gulag. 
Gallows humour is a good safety valve and trust me, this is tame compared to what we used to come up with 
I thought it was edgy and really funny and like all good humour had a basis in truth 
Before ADHD came along we used to have a label for the kids like that; PIA [pain in the arse] -see what I mean? 
All good humour is subversive.Can anyone name one funny right wing comedian 
A well targeted piece of satire.  
jane

Written by coosh (923 comments posted) 6th September 2008
Apart from Boris, Jane... no. 
 
I think the reactions you've had to this piece are probably testament to the quality of the approach you've adopted vis-a-vis the subject matter. Good OTT stuff - course, there is also the veterinary angle - I got a leaflet recently asking if my cat needed counselling - maybe in forty years time this will be commonplace.

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3567 comments posted) 6th September 2008
"Apart from Boris, Jane... no. " 
 
Yes, true coosh ,but there is a difference between laughing with and laughing at.

Written by Phil (6963 comments posted) 6th September 2008
Okay - a review from someone where mental illness is pretty close to home. Nothing wrong with this in terms of offensiveness etc. On a serious level, the conditions you cite are all real (as far as I know) but there is still humour to be had. Odd how this has attracted a little criticism when your piece 'Come on, come on' didn't. 
 
I did enjoy this. It was amusing. For me it lacked the tight focus of your previous piece and tended to ramble a little - perhaps relates to your comment about structure in the intro. The jokes are there - just too much narrative for me. Less is more? 
 
Hope this helps - and not outright criticism - I still enjoyed the read. 
 
Phil 
 
Aaah! As I expected...
Written by wltshr (352 comments posted) 7th September 2008
Golly! I think I'd better give a background to this and address points made. 
 
Two main reasons. Firstly, I wrote a piece ridiculing John Prescott and his bulimia. One of the reviewers said it was cruel and wrong to ridicule Bulimia sufferers, which, I admit, chafed a little. Secondly, I came home a couple of days ago to find a male child, about nine years old, on my land, jumping up and down on a piece of glass, which provides light into my cellar, while his chavvy mum sat on my wall eating chips and chatting to her slapper mate, probably discussing what culinary delights they would be setting on the family supper table later. I admit that my approach to the child was a little curt, and my comments to the mother regarding her parenting skills could have been more generous; but instead of apologising and going away the two harpies went on the attack, informing me that her delightful son was suffering from ADHD and I should be more sympathetic to her plight. I choose not to relate the converation verbatim in case one of you gets a fit of the vapours. 
 
I have been involved, albeit on the periphery, of mental health issues for nearly twenty years. I have met and spoken with a great many sufferers and have heard terrible stories. I have no reason to doubt their truth. I consider myself incredibly lucky that neither I nor any of my immediate family have suffered too badly. I am also aware that amongst fraudulant sickness insurance claims the most popular are back problems and depression. As neither can be accurately tested and thereby confirmed or denied by medical professionals. 
 
Jane: Funny right wing comedian? No. But, I found the New Statesman hilarious. Very right wing, and very much like Tony Blair. How odd. 
 
Phil: Not criticism; controversy. Much more positive. And yes, strange how Paedophilia is less controversial than attitudes towards behaviour, whatever the causes. 
 
Love and hugs to all 
 
Wltshr

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

Next item