Great Writing - Home > Non-Fiction > One hundred schools of thought
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1711 guests online and 3 members online
Non-Fiction
One hundred schools of thought
By Fledermaus
08 September 2008
 


One of the many battles fought in the Age of the Warring States was the Battle of One Hundred Schools of Thought. Out of this fight only two survived into the present day: The school of Ru (Confucianism) and the school of Dao (Taoism), even though it was the school of Fa (Legalism) that once seemed to get the upper hand, when its followers conquered and tried to exterminate all others.

Seen in the light of the current discussion about the some Western schools of thought (religion vs. science), it seems interesting to see how the Hundred Schools can be compared.

The most interesting thing is that they are neither religion nor science, nor can they be compared to Western philosophy. Unlike the metaphysics of the West, the Hundred Schools were born out of pure necessity: The kingdom of Zhou had crumbled into many feudal kingdoms that made constant war upon each other. Reading the accounts of these days I doubt if there was ever an age that was more brutal. Yet within this violent world, there were thinkers, people that tried to come up with solutions, that wanted to teach the people to respect each other and live harmoniously with the world around them.

Confucius suggested that with a set of moral rules, people could be taught ethics. The Taoists on the other hand believed that nature was the guideline and that nothing should be forced. Others, like Mozi believed in equality and helping the poor, while yet others, such as the school of Legalism believed that humans should be made to behave with the constant threat of terrible punishments.

Legalism eventually won, because fear is a handy tool if you're a king with worldwide ambitions. According to the legend Qin Shi Huangdi had all Confucian texts burned and all scholars buried, except for two that blinded themselves and pretended to be crazy. These two are said to have recited everything and thus to have passed on all knowledge.

The whole story might have been a myth invented in the Han dynasty, but the fact is that after the fall of the Legalist Qin dynasty, Confucianism returned and became the dominant school of thought, and though Confucius himself taught tolerance and an open mind, some of his followers did not follow that path.

This became particularly clear when Buddhism entered the Middle Kingdom. Until then none of the schools had bothered much about an afterlife. There were no such thing as dualism, karma and nirvana. Yet here there were people who claimed that by meditation one could reach a state of enlightenment and leave this world. Taoists too placed emphasis on meditation, but instead of reaching nirvana, they wanted to become immortal.

Confucianists thought it was all a load of superstition and during the Tang dynasty there were fierce debates...

Yet what is striking is that in today's Chinese 'religion' and 'philosophy', all three have been blended. Buddhist saints have turned into Taoist immortals and the Lunyu and Daodejing don't seem to bite each other. I wonder if that other Battle of One Hundred schools of Thought will ever reach that state.

Reviews
HI Ron
Written by jean.day (2366 comments posted) 8th September 2008
I learned a lot from this. I sort of thought that Confucianists had always been very high minded - much more Christian than Christians, sort of thing.  
 
I always enjoy your historical pieces, and especially ones where I know nothing about the culture, like in this case.

Written by Fledermaus (3490 comments posted) 8th September 2008
Thanks Jean. 
Concucius himself was a smart guy, but as it goes with such things, people aren't always as flexible as their teachers. From what I learned at a course on the subject, Buddhism was rather alien when it first came to China and especially Confucianists were opposed to it.

Written by Gwynedd (83 comments posted) 9th September 2008
Very clearly and logically presented. I learned about this in my World Civilization class and had already forgotten. It was a good refresher. Two things, minor, 2nd paragraph I think you have an extra 'the'. Double check me on that. 
The 3rd paragraph from the bottom - I think you want to say 'things'. Double check me on that too.  
Well done and informative. Thank you. Gwyn

Written by Fledermaus (3490 comments posted) 9th September 2008
Thanks Gwynedd. I'll correct the typos. 
It's funny to see how relative everything is: In the west Christianity is the main point of discussion, while no doubt many in the east have hardly even heard of it. 
In a lecture on Chinese history one of the teachers remarked that it was pretty silly to measure time in BC and AD while talking about China. To say that Shi Huangdi united China in 221 BC would be like saying that Charlemagne was crowned emperor during the 20th year of the reign of emperor Dezhong of the Tang dynasty...

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

Next item