|
On the eastern side of the Piazza del Popolo, wildly decorated stairs wind up the Pincipian Hill. Under the guidance of dozens of half naked warriors and deities, one leaves the business of the eternal city and enters the realm of the Borghese dynasty.
When I went up those stairs, the hill was set off with red and white tape and instead of following the straight path, I had to walk around the hill to find an entrance. It was clouded and raining. Angels, saints and heroes of ages gone by flanked my path through this enormous park. Neither trees nor lawns seemed too special, but the countless baroque statues and the dark weather gave the gardens a surrealistic and somewhat gothic atmosphere. Showers battered their marble skins as well as my umbrella, while I sought for a way to the renown treasure.
At last, on the other side of the park, I found it, the Galleria Borghese...
Compared to the vastness of the Vatican and the antique ruins of the Forum and the Palatino, it looked small and insignificant, but that was before I had seen what it contained.
For while the emperors and popes may excel in greatness and size, the galleria certainly holds the greatest beauty. There in a colourful baroque hall, surrounded by ancient treasures from the time of Caesar and Traianus, a scene unfolds. A desperate woman looks up to her divine ancestors and cries out for their mercy.
Her name is Daphne and she is pursued by the god of art... Apollo himself is about to touch his nymph as she flees before him, and just as his fingers reach for her waist, her pleadings are answered. Her legs turn into bark, branches grow from her fingers and sprout leaves.
In spite of his beauty and power, the god of all splendid things carved by human hands, deity of the sun and the daylight and patron of the muses shall not have her.
If anyone would ever come close to matching mythical Pygmalion, it's Bernini. Here, in this hall, stone becomes flesh and flesh becomes wood. Leaves so thin they could be real, twigs so tender they would snap in the wind, faces full of emotion. If any artist ever came closer to performing a miracle, he surely deserves his work to be given breath.
A week later, when I was back in the Netherlands, I went to another museum, one which contained a collection of contemporary art. It wasn't my first choice, but I joined the group and tried to appreciate the interesting constructions... Meanwhile though, my mind drifted off to Apollo and Daphne, to Bernini and the Galleria Borghese, and I wondered if there would ever be another sculptor with such talent and skill. Perhaps it would be time for a baroque renaissance?
|
Written by wendycat (2180 comments posted) 22nd November 2009 | Really enjoyed the descriptiveness of this, it caught my attention and held it. I must just say though that for me, a lot of contemporary sculpture is equally evocative as classical pieces. Artists such as Antony Gormley, Heather Jansch, Henry Moore although working in non classical mediums use subjects that people can identify with and which evoke a sense of realisation, and allow an alternate view of life. I see no reason why the two cannot be enjoyed equally. great piece of writing that made me think. Thanks. Wendy x | Written by Nick (706 comments posted) 22nd November 2009 | With Wendy - The way you describe the whole scene is excellent. However I know nothing about Art, Sculptures etc (I had heard of Bernini) so don't know exactly what your talking about but from your descriptions I can almost imagine it. Will Google later to see if I was right. Nick | Written by Fledermaus (4146 comments posted) 23rd November 2009 | Thanks Wendy and Nick. I think it's mainly a matter of taste whether one prefers baroque, renaissance, etc. or contemporary art; But I was absolutely blown away by the beauty of Bernini's work. There were also some Caravaggio's in there, gruesome yet beautiful, but with painters one may also be spoiled in the Netherlands (Rembrant, Vermeer, etc.) Yet statues... I didn't even know one could do that with marble. | No comparison Written by Bottleblondesurfer (5054 comments posted) 23rd November 2009 | You do raise an interesting question but it is at heart a pointless one. I can and still do admire the works of the renaissance, I also enjoy the baroque [though some of it's worst excesses make me wince] but I also enjoy the more contemporary works and see no real dividing line. It is indvious to compare art against art. I feel so strongly about that. It makes me dispirited to hear it I don't see why we cannot enjoy what is good in whatever age. I think the Chagall windows at the Hadassah centre are as good as anything done by Giotto, Bernine, or Rembrant. They are quite breathtakingly beautiful. Indeed all the artists that Wendy mentions are worthy of comparison [if you must do that] It's funny how distance and time lends enchantment. Van Gogh is hailed as genius and his work fetches eye-watering sums but he couldn't' give his pictures away when he was alive. Honestly if you compare art you lose so much. Let's just be glad we have those wonderful works of the renaissance and keep an open eye. It's all good cheers jane | Written by Fledermaus (4146 comments posted) 23rd November 2009 | Thanks Jane, I do disagree: One of the things with much contemporary art is that I question the skill of the artists. I personally consider the Renaissance ideal that one should first study and try to equal an exemplary master and then surpass him, as a good method. Yet with many contemporary artists I get the impression that they do not have enough skill and rush into individual expression before they even have the tools to do so properly. I once visited an arts academy to see if they could teach me, but when I saw the works on the wall, I gave up on that idea, and after a talk to the headmaster, I was convinced that modern art has very little to do with craft and skill and much with a smart mouth. I think that art which cannot speak for itself does not require an explanation, but rather improvement... People should not distort proportions and perspective before he learned how to do them right. If they are skilled and talented, they can experiment and play tricks with such things (consider Picasso or Mondriaan; I do not like their art, but at least they showed they were talented). Yet of many of those abstract painters and sculptors, I doubt if they get the shapes and colours they want or just talk right what went wrong... Just an opinion of course, of someone who admires classical, renaissance and baroque art, wouldn't hang a Van Gogh on his wall if he got it for free and decided not to go to the arts academy because they coldn't teach anything new... | Slight modification Written by Fledermaus (4146 comments posted) 23rd November 2009 | A slight modification there: I met a few artisits who make abstract art and who are certainly very skilled in the (sur)realistic too. The sad thing though is that the abstract stuff sold better. One of them was disappointed about this, for his realistic paintings were absolutely great, yet no-one wanted them, while his abstract stuff made him a living. Another one did the opposite, earned money with portraits, and painted abstract things in her time off, yet she had to admit herself she wouldn't hang them on her own wall. In many cases thus, the cause is with the customers, not with the artists. | Written by Bottleblondesurfer (5054 comments posted) 24th November 2009 | Well,Ron it is perfectly valid to say you don't like certain art pieces, that's a fair and honest comment.It is when people start to extrapolate and say that they are lesser works or bad that you move into a grey area. And that is what I disagree with. As you say in your modification a lot of it is down to fashion, things go in an out of fashion but it doesn't affect their intrinsic value. I rather rudely forgot to say that, though I disagreed with some of what you said, I thought it very well written and vivid bit of work which I enjoyed reading jane | Written by Josie (4035 comments posted) 28th November 2009 | | "Those who love to pursue fleeting forms of pleasure, in the end find only leaves and bitter berries in their hands." Does this quote ring a bell? As true today as at any time I think. Oh, how I have enjoyed reading this Ron. I would love to know more about art. I guess it is never too late. My husband did his degree through Open University when he was 57. It's never too late. The comments above apply to the whole world of art. So very interesting. |
Only registered users can rate and write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |