Great Writing - Home > Short S. > Tele-sales defence
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1535 guests online and 3 members online
Shorts
Tele-sales defence
By Snodlander
19 October 2006
This would probably work better as a script or sketch. 

We were chatting about the best way to get rid of tele-sales people...

The defending counsel rose to his feet.

"Miss Andrews, thank you for your testimony. I just have one or two questions for you. Your job title is…", he looked at the notes in front of him, "… Prospect Identifier. Is that correct?"

"Yes", said Miss Andrews, nodding.

"Could you tell the court exactly what that entails?"

"I telephone prospective customers, inform them of our product line and qualify them for Sales."

"And how do you know they are prospective customers?"

"I’m sorry?" She asked, confused.

"You called them ‘prospective customers’. What have they done in order to earn them that sobriquet? How", he asked, faced with her blank look, "do you know that they are ‘prospective customers’?"

"Oh!" She said, comprehension dawning. "We have a script, questions we ask them, and if they are interested they are routed through to second-line sales."

"So they become prospective customers after you have phoned them?"

"Yes, I suppose."

"How do you choose who to telephone? Have they already contacted you?"

"Oh no", she replied, surer of her ground here. "We cold call. We buy a list of names and telephone numbers and work our way down the list."

"And how many people do you call in a normal day?"

"We have a list of 500 per day that we are targeted with calling, but normally we only get to speak with about 100, because people are out or the phone number doesn’t work or something."

"And how many people do you refer to your sales department in one day?"

She shrugged. "Maybe half a dozen."

The solicitor looked again at his notes. "So when my learned colleague asked you if you made the call in the ‘expectation’ of a sale, the chances were 100 to one that you would make a sale, and even after he answered the chances were still about one in twenty?"

She looked nonplussed. "I guess."

"Then ‘expectation’ is a little strong, don’t you think? Wouldn’t ‘hope’ be a better term?"

She looked at the magistrates’ bench, then back to the counsel. "I suppose so."

The defence counsel nodded, as though finally understanding something.

"Now, Miss Andrews, I want to ask you some questions about the transcript of this conversation, which your employer so fortuitously recorded." He picked up a sheaf of papers. "You exchange pleasantries, you identify yourself and your company, and inform my client that this conversation is being recorded for training purposes.

"Then my client says, I quote, ‘Damn, but you have a sexy voice. Are you as gorgeous as you sound?" Is that correct?"

Miss Andrews looked stern, "Yes."

"Did you find this obscene, Miss Andrews?"

"Not exactly."

"Were you offended?"

"Not at this point."

"In fact, the transcript at this point records that you laughed and called him…" he checked the paper, "… ‘a cheeky little monkey’. Is that correct?"

She looked uncomfortable. "Yes, but I didn’t realise he was a perv at that point."

He smiled at her. "Please restrict your comments to answers to my questions, Miss Andrews. At this point, did you give my client any indication that you were uncomfortable with the conversation?"

"No, I suppose not."

"No, indeed. In fact you proceeded to ask him questions about double glazing. Was this according to the script you mentioned?"

"Yes."

"And in reply to your question asking which of the range of products your company manufactures my client was interested in, his reply was what?"

"He asked me what I was wearing", she replied, shifting awkwardly in the witness box.

"Did you think this was appropriate?"

"No" she said, emphatically shaking her head.

"Were you offended?"

"Too right."

"Too right indeed, Miss Andrews. In fact you told him to mind his own business?"

"Yes. He had no right to ask me that."

"Yet you repeated your question about what he was interested in. Why did you not hang up at this point?"

"I can’t hang up at that point in the script."

"I see." He perused the transcript again. "He appeared to be interested in windows… how many… colour… Ah here it is. In reply to ‘Do you have replacement doors?’, he answered, ‘Wait one. I’m going hands-free.’ What did you think he meant by that?"

Prosecuting counsel rose to his feet. "Objection, Your Worships. It calls for conjecture."

"My client is accused of making an obscene phone call, Your Worships", he answered. "I am trying to establish what Miss Andrews considered to be obscene."

"Proceed, Mr Smith, but please take into account Miss Andrews sensibilities."

"Thank you, Your Worships. Now Miss, Andrews. What did you think he meant by ‘going hands-free’?"

She looked uncomfortable. "I thought he meant he was going on speaker-phone, so he could… you-know…"

"And you found this offensive?"

"Too bloody right I did. He’s got no right to perv me like that."

"And yet you proceeded to talk to him about replacement doors?"

"Yes. It was in the script."

"And when he said, I quote, ‘Yeah baby, tell me about those deadlocks. I love deadlock talk.’, what was your reaction?"

"I was disgusted", she said, shooting the defendant a dirty look. "He was making me feel cheap."

"But according to the transcript, Miss Andrews, it was you that brought up the subject of deadlocks, not my client."

"Yes, but he was getting all… excited."

"Indeed. And customers have no right to be excited about your products."

"Not like that. Not all pervy."

"And then you terminated the conversation with…" he checked the transcript, and raised his eyebrows in apparent surprise. "… with an admonition to perform a sexual act that I am fairly certain is anatomically impossible."

Miss Andrews blushed.

Counsel turned to the magistrates’ bench.

"Your Worships, my client is charged with making an obscene phone call pursuant to Section 43 of the Telecommunications Act 1984. I ask that the charge be dismissed forthwith for the following two reasons.

"Firstly, according to the transcript offered in evidence by the prosecution, the only obscenities uttered were by Miss Andrews.

"And secondly, by Miss Andrews own admission, she made the unsolicited call to my client. As far as I can ascertain, there is no legislation outlawing the receiving of an obscene phone call."

Reviews

Written by Phil (6836 comments posted) 19th October 2006
I always find,"Do you know Jesus as your personal saviour?" works a treat. Clever piece Snoddy. Enjoyed. 
 
All the best, 
 
Phil.

Written by brolgablue (10 comments posted) 20th October 2006
Well paced amusing write. I 
 
cannot tolerate this kind of home invasion and just hang up immediately although I do like Phil's suggestion although it would be my luck that the telemarketer would belong to the God Squad.  
 
Regards 
Julia

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3445 comments posted) 20th October 2006
I think it would work better as a script,it's almost is one anyway. You could format it and see how it reads.. I thought it was clever concept and you got the courtroom dialogue off pat and there was nice little re-frame at the end. As a script I think it might need a few more gags or funny exchanges on the way to the end but perhaps I being unfair as it is in stories not comedy 
Anyway I,too,liked it 
cheers 
Jane 
P.S my way of dealing with these calls is to pretend my English is poor.
Very amusing
Written by JasonDJ (16 comments posted) 20th October 2006
I laughed to myself at a few points: the overall idea of propositioning a telemarketer amuses me greatly, and Miss Andrews' assertion that she 'can’t hang up at that point in the script' is convincing in its absurdity. I do think though that it's a one-read-only piece. It could possibly work as a comedy sketch, but as bottleblondesurfer points out it would probably (I would say certainly) need more jokes.  
 
The problem with it as a piece of prose is that the central premise is flawed. The defence counsel's submission at the end is predictable - the defendant obviously couldn't be charged with making an obscene call and the case wouldn't get to court. Reading it as a work in progress, I suspended my reservations over this; likewise you would have a bit of leeway if it was a sketch in a comedy show, but I don't think it would stand up as a published piece. The flip-side is that if you just depicted the phone conversation you would lose too much subtlety. 
 
I hope this doesn't discourage you. If I had written this, I would be pleased with myself, but I don't think I'd take it further. If you do decide to take this further, I think your options are put in a lot more jokes and write a comedy sketch, or find a way of making it work as a short-story. I would love it if you proved me wrong and came up with a fantastic piece of writing. 
 
Best of luck, 
 
Jason. 

Written by Snodlander (507 comments posted) 20th October 2006
You're right, of course. I thought the idea of the dilema facing someone who is paid to talk to you enduring a weirdo quite amusing, But I'm not sure I'd be that good at a quick-fire gag sketch. Possibly scripting the phone call, with the customer getting weirder and weirder, might work. But it's going on the back burner for a while. 
 
And on a pedantic note, in fact the Telecommunications Act 1984 makes no distinction as to initiates the call. It is an offense to be obscene on the phone, regardless of who dialed the number, so it could feasibly get to court. I allowed myself a little licence in order to use the phrase 'outlawing the receiving of an obscene phone call'.
Worked for me....
Written by SammoR (125 comments posted) 2nd December 2006
 
Inspired choice, the courtroom setting. Most UK writers cock up courtroom scenes by making them sound American, but you got it quite right. No banging gavels, no 'Objection! Sustained,' no 'striking from the record.' 
 
The bit about 'an act which... is anatomically impossible' was a beauty! 
 
One wee niggle. You describe the defence advocate as 'counsel' , i.e a barrister, for most of the story, but at least once you refer to him as a 'solicitor'. 
 

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item