Great Writing - Home > Short S. > Available From Your Nearest Stuckist
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 2053 guests online and 7 members online
Shorts
Available From Your Nearest Stuckist
By coosh
25 October 2006
A comedy sketch that's ended up midway between Not News and Short Stories

Contrary to popular belief, the famous painter J.M.W. Turner did not die in 1851, but was cryogenically preserved, at his own request, in order to see what had become of the large fortune he had bequeathed to benefit those he called “decayed artists”. Due to global warming, his body was naturally defrosted one October evening, during refurbishments on the Sainsbury Wing of the National Gallery, when a workman dropped his mug of tea through a hole in a staircase and activated the nineteenth-century freezer unit. Having been put to sleep during a cholera epidemic, his first words were, as he raised his head and looked down at his naked body, “I appear to have a monstrous carbuncle adorning a much-loved and elegant friend”.

The Tate thus decided it would be only fitting to make him one of the judges in the highly-coveted Turner Prize. After all, it had been named in his honour.


I was one of the privileged few journalists who accompanied Mr. Turner and his entourage as they previewed the potentially award-winning work of the men and women competing for the accolade of Britain’s most prestigious artist. Plus £25,000 and unlimited bondage with Charles Saatchi. I can therefore offer a blow-by-blow account.


Mr. Turner was not in good health, and during spasmodic coughing fits, discharged copious amounts of black phlegm over the well-polished floor. Although he complained about the lack of sunrises, sunsets and snowstorms on display, any evidence of the eccentricity for which he had been famed in later life, was purely circumstantial.


As he explained upon entering the gallery:
“They said I was mad, you know, just because I used to stand on railway lines and sketch locomotives hurtling towards me. Mind you, they said my mother was mad as well, and all she ever did was open a rest home for bewildered pit canaries in Margate. We had a cockatoo the spitting image of Disraeli. Used to sing the Greek national anthem on one leg wearing a slipper and a wig. Is that a toupee under your arm, Madam? Why are we standing in the toilets?”


At this juncture, one of the judges pointed out that these were not the toilets, but the first exhibit. It consisted of a line of gleaming white porcelain wash-basins and had been aptly entitled “The Ethereal Politics of Bathroom Fittings”. At regular intervals a bubble would begin to inflate in one of the plug-holes, and upon bursting, a rendition of the Warsaw Concerto would emanate from the U-bend. It is, I believe, a unique monument to the history and expansion of 21st century Polish plumbing in Western Europe.


Mr. Turner had only one real criticism to make of the work, as he threw up over it.


“You know what this needs, don’t you. Steam. Masses and masses of steam. That’s what I used to do. Cover the thing in billowing clouds of the stuff, so instead of a wash-basin, you get the impression of a wash-basin, which is much better. If we turn on all the hot taps for half an hour, I think you’ll see what I mean.”


Having unsuccessfully tried to turn on the first tap, he struck it hard with his walking stick.


“Damned thing’s broken. You need a plumber,” he said, scowling. “Shall we move on, then. I’ve only got two months to live.”


The catalogue described the second exhibit as “various detritus from in and out of the artist’s studio, plus things she found on the road.” It was therefore the favourite. In 2004, this heap of rubble had been cleverly converted into a row of terraced houses just outside Salford, before being subsequently restored to its original condition, thus giving it the name “Shit-Houses-Shit” (and, on occasions, “Shit-Shit-Shit”).


“It’s mainly dust, hair and organic spaghetti,” explained the judge. “But somewhere, if I’m not mistaken, there lies a penis erection pump. With an attachment for removing unwanted boils. Ah, there it is. Poking through the hole in the tea-cosy.”


Given his condition, Mr. Turner expressed warm enthusiasm for such a gadget and, turning to the assembled crowd, asked if anyone wished to see the “monstrous carbuncle” dangling between his legs.


“I’m sure there will be a suitably sound surgical solution for you,” remarked the judge, diplomatically.


“That’s easy for you say,” replied the artist. “I haven’t had sex for a hundred and fifty years. If I ejaculated from the main entrance right now, the bloody thing’d probably shoot over Tower Bridge. You know what this exhibit needs? Smoke. Clouds and clouds of smoke. Cavorting, gigantic, undulating puffs of the stuff, everywhere. Then, instead of a pile of shit, you get the impression of a pile of shit, which is much better. Have you got a match so we can set light to it?”


Which, funnily enough, was the same question asked by the critic from the Evening Standard the day before.


“They slated me for being indistinct, you know. Indistinct, my arse. I used to tell them “indistinctness, gentlemen, is my forte”. It was my catchphrase. I knew how to put down the hecklers in those days.”


The final exhibit was entitled “Definition by Absence”. It consisted of a mass of names written on various items of clothing strewn haphazardly over a lathe. All the names had one thing in common.


“So, we have here, for example,” explained the judge, “the words Ike and Tina, Frederick Jackson, Kathleen, Bachmann, Overdrive. They all point to one other key name.”


The artist naturally looked bemused.


“It’s you, Sir. Turner.” the judge revealed. “You have been sculpturally demarcated by your absence.”


“But I’m not absent. I’m here.” replied Turner. “You know what this exhibit needs? Fire! Fire! I adore fire. I remember seeing the Houses of Parliament go up in flames once, a raging inferno that woke up all the politicians and created a national emergency. And you know what I did?”


“What?” asked the judge.


“Jumped in a boat and painted it. If it hadn’t been for that idiot Lord Melbourne and his bloody fire engines, I’d have polished off more than a dozen canvases that afternoon.”


At which point, the famous artist J.M.W. Turner made a decision. Given that this was an open competition, he proposed to enter it himself, and summoned forth his masterpiece “The Fighting Temeraire” from the National Gallery.


“Even if you resigned as a judge,” they told him, “you would not be allowed to enter the competition.”


“Why not?” replied Turner, indignantly. “Didn’t you just say it was all about people’s freedom of expression?”


“It is all about people’s freedom of expression,” said the judge. “Provided that you’re under the age of fifty.”


Turner was outraged. He concluded that, as it was his own bloody prize, he could change the rules as he damned well liked. And decide who won it. It was the first time an oil painting had received the prestigious award since its inauguration in 1984.
 

Within six weeks he was dead again. However, with the money he received, the famous painter J.M.W. Turner was able to rest in peace, comforted by the satisfaction that he would no longer have to endure his monstrous carbuncle. Unlike Prince Charles. Who still has to live with his.

As a footnote, Mr. Turner left one express recommendation to the people of Britain. It was read out during the oration at his second funeral in St. Paul’s Cathedral:


“If you decide to have your body cryogenically preserved, do it when you’re young. Rather than waiting until you’re a terminally ill pensioner with chronic lumbago and sciatica, and have only two months to live. I suggest about twenty-five, just after your first-born child”.

Reviews

Written by Phil (6632 comments posted) 25th October 2006
You know what this piece needs? 
 
No. Good bit of writing. A wonderful way to lampoon the Turner prize - bring the man himself back. Great idea, well done. 
 
All the best, 
 
Phil.
Hi Coosh
Written by BrianRobertNeal (1195 comments posted) 25th October 2006
Another one of your pieces that goes dow untrodden paths. 
 
You lightly slap out in all directions 
 
At Turner, 
 
At the "Emperor's new suit of clothes" world of "Modern Art." 
 
and Cryogenic preserving. 
 
To name a few, a great amusing and novel read, 
 
Brian.
And now, for my next con...
Written by woody44 (774 comments posted) 25th October 2006
Smashing satirical piece Coosh. reminds me of a report in yesterday`s paper about this bloke who`d been given an Art Council grant to fill an art gallery with...nothing! He said people could then walk round it and..think of other galleries they`d visited! I know, you couldn`t make it up could you.. 
 
happy writing 
woody.

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3291 comments posted) 25th October 2006
Hi coosh I think you may have created a new genre, like the time they came up with "magical realism" to describe a certain style.I think you have produced "surreal satire". It's not too heavy handed which often happens with satire and it effortlessly lurches into "Hitchhikers" science fantasy; totally loony but still making a point . 
Well that's my take on it. I may not know what I'm talking about but I know what I like. Really enjoyed it 
Beep beep 
BBS
The Art of Mayhem...
Written by gerardconnolly (1186 comments posted) 25th October 2006
Lovely stuff David. Do you ever remember the cartoonist , Steve Bell's biting take on this invoving the missing brain of Ronald Regan? Your's was equally witty.  
 
Now you've got that off your chest, there is a world of sumptious idiocy out there for you to work on. Writer's block!? My arse! Pick up any newspaper and you won't know where to stop. 
 
Well done! 
 
Slan!

Written by coosh (844 comments posted) 26th October 2006
There has been a lot of bollocks uttered in favour of and against the Turner Prize. I think this contributes to the debate.

Written by coosh (844 comments posted) 26th October 2006
But seriously,  
Thanks, Phil! Yes, I know what it needs, and it involves an incinerator. The idea of bringing Turner back came from a quote (probably a Stuckist) who said the only person not in danger of winning the Turner Prize was Turner himself. Until I checked, I hadn't realised there was an age limit - so, that must be the reason. Cheers. 
 
Thank you, Brian. Cryogenics and modern art ain't difficult to have a pop at - I didn't really want to mock Britain's favourite painter, but the thought of a half-mad, resuscitated romantic judging his own prize was too good to ignore. Also, he was a heavy drinker, in later life, apparently, rum and milk was his tipple... and gin - and this year's event is sponsored by Gordon's. You'd have thought they could have made something of that. Many thanks for your comments. 
 
Woody - you say "you couldn't make it up" - the second exhibit is a quote from this year's actual catalogue - OK it's not a "pile" of fluff and dirt, it's in a glass display case. (An empty art gallery is just disgusting, an' I bet there's homeless people a couple o' streets down). 
Thanks for the comments. 

Written by coosh (844 comments posted) 26th October 2006
Thank you for that BBS and Gerard. 
 
I spent four years studying magic realism, a long time ago, (he said pretentiously) and having taken it all to bits and analysed it, went from being really enthusiastic to rather cynical about it. The danger with this stuff (and I'm not sure if Gerard is necessarily hinting at this) is that it can become a bit formulaic. You can take any subject and sort of feed it through the same program. It's at least got to try and sound fresh each time. 
 
However, I'm very glad you're tuned into the Loony FM wavelength, BBS, and I do think you know what you're talking about, even if I don't. 
 
Reagan's Brain is a vague memory, Gerard. As it is for many people. Was it part of the "If.." cartoons? I do, however, remember "Maggie's Farm" in Time Out. With that encouragement, I'll focus my "sumptious idiocy" on something else.... that bird with the long neck's been in the news today...  
 
British...
Written by Fledermaus (3230 comments posted) 26th October 2006
Nice piece of typical British humour... Dark and twisted, absurd and sometimes disgusting, but nevertheless funny.

Written by coosh (844 comments posted) 26th October 2006
Thank you, Fledermaus, for your kind words. You must have read my school report as well. Will check out your "movie star" later today.
Priceless
Written by ellipinnock (1753 comments posted) 27th October 2006
Not a lot more to add really, it's all been said. Really enjoyed this, it flowed well, had a good sense of fun to it and, lets face it, anything that sends up something as preposterous as the Turner Prize as become is well worth while. Great work. 
 
Elli

Written by coosh (844 comments posted) 27th October 2006
Thank you, Elli. I'm sure you, along with the rest of the nation, will be glued to Channel 4's live coverage of the award ceremony in December.

Written by Gill21 (566 comments posted) 27th October 2006
'dark, twisted and absurd' - exactly what i was thinking when reading it! Honestly, not really my thing but i enjoyed reading it nevertheless. Well written with a 'coosh' style. The turner prize? god don't get me started...

Written by coosh (844 comments posted) 27th October 2006
That's quite a compliment to say you enjoyed reading it even though it's not your style. Thanks, Gill. To be honest, I think the Turner Prize has become a sort of quirky British institutional exhibit in itself, largely because of how seriously they take themselves - the lady who produced the fluff and dirt actually said of her work, "For somebody it could mean one thing and for somebody else it could mean something else". Quite deep, eh? It's the same with low-fat yoghurt, I think...

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item