While traveling through Mexico years ago, I happened to meet my very first lesbian couple, a Japanese girl and her German friend, both in their early twenties. I had just moved to San Francisco, but I was still pretty shocked. Years later, while studying the events of WWII, the more I thought about that couple, the more wonderful they seemed. What a kick in the Axis' teeth -- two independent young women who couldn't care less about making more male babies to turn into soldiers and who were, in fact, lesbians. I am currently corresponding with two WWII veterans. I told one of them about this couple and he insisted that I should write a story about them. So here it is.
HOT WATER After it happened, neither Margret nor Tamie could agree on which one of them deserved most of the credit. Tamie was the one with a trick-spot, it was true, a place on her back that she couldn’t bear to have touched. She also had a piercing scream that was, Margret claimed, a lethal weapon in its own right. A voice like that was wasted on a nurse, Margret maintained. She herself was a high school teacher and had often felt that an ear-piercing voice would be a great advantage. But then it wasn’t Tamie who kept forgetting that you didn’t leave your soap on the floor next to the bathtub where someone could slip on it – not in Japan, anyway. The fact that the bathtub was built of stone and the water in it was scalding-hot – well, that had a lot to do with it too. One thing was for sure: they were damn lucky. That they both agreed on. It had all started just after they’d boarded the bus that was to take them to their hotel. They’d been in high spirits: their first holiday together in ages! Finally they were out of Tokyo, away from their respective jobs, the rush-hour trains, all the big-city bustle and nonsense of Tokyo. Who cared if they didn’t see a decent coffee shop for another two weeks? They were free, together, and out of Tokyo. Being away from Tamie’s family and their relentless (and futile) match-making plans didn’t hurt either. Sitting together as the bus twisted and turned along the winding mountain road past tiny shrines and rustic little temples, it was hard to imagine that anything could go wrong. Five minutes into their journey, however, the bus lurched to a stop and a small group of people got on, including the problem. The problem was small – after a fashion – but infinitely pesky. He was short, he had a potbelly and a punch perm and – worse luck – he had a side-kick who looked even meaner and uglier. ‘Yakuza,’ murmured Tamie, her voice barely a whisper. ‘Be cool, but don’t be nasty. These guys are probably chimpira – just small fry – but they’re trouble.’ Yakuza were a pain in the butt. If you were rude to them, you took a risk: yakuza were easy to offend, notorious for the oversized chips on their shoulders. If you were nice to them, though, they stuck to you like ugly on a walrus. Margret was young and naïve. She tended to be nice to everybody, so she was especially vulnerable. She also happened to be drop-dead beautiful with a figure that had to be a source of endless torment for most of the high school boys she taught English to, so she was pretty much a magnet for assholes. And Margret had definitely attracted the yakuza’s attention: he was staring at her with barely-concealed lust. His friend had turned his dull-witted but equally lecherous eyes their way too. Damn! ‘Let’s pretend we can’t speak English. Let’s speak German,’ whispered Tamie just before the two yakuza installed themselves in the seats opposite theirs and began to make the inevitable overtures. Unfortunately, only Margret really spoke German – the odd greeting and a few clumsily-constructed sentences were all Tamie could manage so far – but the yakuza weren’t going to know that, were they? It didn’t work. ‘No English?’ queried Margret’s lech. No problem. ‘Ich liebe dich,’ he offered, obviously proud of his international communication skills. He’d tried English first (You are very beautiful and What is your name?) His less verbal companion tried a more direct approach. He opened his girlie magazine to a favorite page and held it open for them to see. Two women engaged in pleasantries with each other, obviously for the delectation of a male audience. Oh, these guys were real charmers. German peoples, Japanese peoples – good combination, said Margret’s lech next, in a conversational manner. Lose war, but stay friend – good combination. Margret stared straight ahead, a pained look on her face, and Tamie sighed inwardly. She’d heard this one a few times in the two years she and Margret had been together. Pretty soon this asshole would say Heil Hitler – it was just a matter of time. Heil Hitler, said the asshole, looking at Margret meaningfully. Tamie could feel her lover’s body stiffen. Damn! How far away was their hotel, anyway? She squeezed Margret’s hand. Not far now, she reassured her. The lech leaned forward in his seat, his eyes all over Margret. German women – very nice, he said approvingly. Japanese women – he held his hands out palms parallel and moved them up and down. No blest, he sneered. Tamie burned with rage. Here’s a fellow with a pot belly, 5’4” in his elevator shoes, tops. And he dares to criticize women’s bodies? To their dismay, the yakuza got off the bus at their hotel. We’ll book another place tomorrow, Tamie assured Margret. Too bad, really. The hotel was everything they’d been promised: quaint and old-fashioned, but flawlessly clean. The communal bathrooms were even nicer than the guidebook had described them. There was an outside hot spring, women’s and men’s sides separated by a bamboo screen. You could immerse yourself in hot water and gaze up at the stars, breathe in the fresh piney air. The indoor communal bathroom was just as spectacular: pale bamboo floors in the dressing room, wall-to-wall mirrors and complimentary toiletries. The bath itself was huge, a shining stretch of piping-hot mineral water that gushed into the overflowing stone tub from a marble dragon surrounded by ferns. There was a good view of the outside bath through one-way glass windows, too. With lecherous characters like those yakuza around, that one-way glass was particularly reassuring. Fortunately, the yakuza disappeared shortly after they booked in. Tamie and Margret took a leisurely walk around the town. When they got back to the hotel, they had a quick bath to freshen up, then retired to their room. This is heavenly, sighed Margret, snuggling up to Tamie. She suddenly sat up, biting her lip. Is the door locked? she asked. Of course, Tamie reassured her. Think I’d take any chances when Monkey-face and his buddy could be in the next room for all we know? Dinner was served in their room. Tempura, lightly fried to perfection, thinly sliced raw fish with horseradish and local pickles, tiny seafood stews that cooked in covered iron pots right in front of them, savory egg custards with chicken and herbs, salt-broiled trout, and plenty of beer to wash it all down. While they ate dinner, the maid came in and put down their futons. This was the beauty of being a lesbian couple: you were basically anonymous – just two ladies travelling on your own. Gay men didn’t have it so easy. Two men sharing a room made a lot of people raise their eyebrows, but two women sharing seldom got the same reaction. Unless you walked into the establishment wrapped around your partner and French-kissed at the check-in desk, you were just two friends on holiday together. Much later, they went down to the indoor communal bath for a long soak. It was pitch-dark by this time, or they would have used the outside bath instead, but neither of them wanted to take chances with those yakuza around. Lock the door, Tamie told Margret. No one else’ll be coming down at this hour. Giggling, they undressed and put their clothes in the baskets provided. The room was dimly lit, the swirling steam creating an atmosphere that was both romantic and mysterious. Condensation clouded the huge plate glass window. Margret stepped into the bath to wipe it off, but cried out; the water was boiling hot. Put in some cold water, advised Tamie. But Margret couldn’t get the cold tap handle to budge. It’s stuck, she fretted. Tamie sighed and came over to help. You’d think that Margret, who was larger and far more competent-looking than she was, ought to be able to manage, but she was hopeless with things like this. Pickle jars, wine bottles, you name it – she ended up wringing her hands and calling for help every time. Silly billy! Tamie chided her now, picking her way over to the tap through the swirling steam. And you’ve left your soap on the floor for me to slip on again, too! Later, they realized the yakuza must have picked the lock. At the time, absorbed in trying to turn on the cold-water tap, with the rushing sound of the hot water filling their ears, they hadn’t heard the noise. And they’d both had their backs to the door, so when the lech grabbed Tamie from behind, it had come as a complete surprise. Problem was, he’d touched her trick-spot. Not long after they had first gotten together, Margret had learned to steer clear of Tamie’s trick-spot. If you didn’t want a broken eardrum – or worse – you were wise to do so. Everyone in my family knows about this spot! Tamie laughed. Once when we were playing, my little sister touched my spot. I could not help myself – my arm flew back, I broke her nose! I felt very, very bad, but my mother said that it could not be helped, she touched my trick-spot. Very dangerous, my trick-spot! The yakuza who grabbed Tamie was, for all his puny size, much larger and stronger than her younger sister. But her ear-splitting scream took him by surprise and he let go of her, dropping the syringe he was holding. He also jarred his friend, who had been next to him, causing him to lose his balance. This would not have been a problem if he had spotted the soap on the floor. Unfortunately, he stepped squarely on it and plunged forward straight into the boiling-hot water, whacking his head on the stone side on his way in. Tamie wasted no time looking for a weapon. Spotting the syringe on the floor, she grabbed it and, with a nurse’s deft sleight-of-hand, emptied it into the thigh of her attacker. Ketamine, Tamie told their friends later, a date rape drug. A horse anesthetic! Two good doses he got, too. If he survived, he’s probably still unconscious. There had been enough in the syringe for both Tamie and Margret, it turned out. The men had obviously come prepared to party. Along with the ketamine, they’d brought a length of rope and a top-of-the-line video camera. Such a waste, an expensive camera like that ending up in the bath! lamented Tamie. Margret nodded. Ja, well, at least we saved the film. You were awfully clever, figuring out how to use it, Tami. Tamie shrugged and smiled modestly. I just hope their, ah, colleagues will recognize them on the Internet, she said. With all the mist in that room and the blood pouring out of the one fellow’s nose. Kind of hard to see. Margret patted her hand. But their tattoos – their friends will recognize those, she said. Tamie nodded, wrinkling her nose. It hadn’t been too hard pulling the cotton robes off the unconscious yakuza, but it certainly hadn’t been a pleasant experience. You know, said Margret, those yakuza – they were right about one thing. Tamie turned to stare at her. Margret laughed and put her arms around her. Germans and Japanese, she said, good combination. |
Great write Written by wattle (117 comments posted) 12th November 2006 | | Witzl - Thank you a great story told by an expert story teller --- I like - Thank you. | HI Witzl Written by jean.day (2257 comments posted) 12th November 2006 | | Another wonderful story - so well told. It is fascinating hearing about life in Japan, and these amazing characters. | I love the way you write... Written by Clifftown (619 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | ...you make it seem so easy and effortless. I really enjoyed this story; what woman hasn't been in the company of a 5 foot 2, balding man criticising women's looks?! You painted a lovely picture of Tamie and Margret's relationship and I was so glad the yakuza got their comeuppance in the end! A great story, expertly written. | Germaine Greer... Written by Talisker (1320 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Eat your heart out. Dear Witzl, what a man-hating piece of nonsense. Add militant, life-style lesbianism to the mix and you have something that is written exclusively for women. Perhaps only gay men would read this and smile with enjoyment. I haven't been shy in the past about expressing my views about homosexuality. Undeniably, its a genetic abheration, in the sense that it fails to propogate the race. Arguably, these days, its often a lifestyle choice, a rebellion against conformity. I find that distasteful, although I acknowledge that consenting adults have a right to do what they wish. Now, to the "story" - the only male characters are despicable rapists, no redeeming characteristics at all. The lesbians are lovely sensetive creatures, perfect human beings. If I wrote this story in reverse, the GW righteous majority would pummel me flat - and quite right too! Its fairly well written, though not in my opinion up to your usual standard. For example, the analogy that the Yakuza "stuck to her like an ugly walrus" - who says walrus are ugly? and unless anyone has experienced a walrus adhering to them, I doubt that it would help as a description anyway. You can see that you certainly got a reaction from me on this one. A very good writer, a badly chosen subject, lamely and offensively (to about half the population) delivered. Sorry Witzl! Oli | Oh, and... Written by Talisker (1320 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | I'm not a homophobe. I'm not scared of them at all. Oli | A good feminist story ... Written by johniebg (538 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | ... well told. Tripped me up with the leaving tokyo para, you restate you leaving about three times. Same thing with the bit about women together in hotels being anonymous. For my mind I knew what would happen when you said unfortunately he touched her trick spot, was set up nicely at the beginning, so the para you had explaining it took away from the art of the story. As usual lovely visual descriptions, and I iked the sense of smell you gave the reader, pine aroma filled my mind at one stage. | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Oli, we shall have to agree to disagree here! I don't think it's a great story myself, and I regret the absence of good men. If I'd had time, I'd have stuck in a few -- there are always plenty lying around. Having worked with children in the past, I have come to the conclusion that a preference to one's own gender is not a lifestyle choice, it is innate. Even my uncle, a doctor who was also very anti-homosexual, had to admit that the hormones of gay men (not sure about women, but I'm willing to bet) actually displayed chemical differences to those of straight men. But even without that laboratory proof, I cannot imagine how we can attribute the fact that 10% of the population has always preferred people of the same gender to a lifestyle choice on their part and not a physically inherent trait. I do know that a lot of people find homosexuality offensive. The same people who ignore so many outdated Old Testament rules -- keeping Kosher, keeping the Sabbath, etc. -- suddenly become very adamant and outspoken about the sin of homosexuality. All of us work with and mix with and perhaps even live with homosexuals -- it is simply that many of them won't acknowledge what they are for fear of being scorned and rejected. I think that is wrong. We are what we are. Homosexuality is not like kleptomania or pedophilia -- something that hurts others. Our population seems to be doing just fine -- indeed, almost too well; there are heterosexuals who decide not to breed, so what does it matter that ten percent of the population opts out of the breeding game? It hasn't hurt the world's population yet, and it has been going on since the dawn of time. I made the characters of this story lesbians because I like the idea that these two came from societies that have, in the past, had strong fascist, misogynist components. The fact that they come out okay in the end and are 'good' does not mean that men are, perforce, 'bad.' Nor does it mean that all lesbians are good. But each to his or her own, Oli, and I still appreciate and admire your honesty. | Honesty; honestly... Written by gerardconnolly (1186 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | My honesty is a touch limp- if you will excuse the expression-alongside that of Oli. I have no strong feelings on the subject per se. If someone is bent as the bum boy's bugle, that is their affair; not mine. I will, of course, always treat with them sitting down. A simple precaution, you understand. Growing up in Ireland there was no such thing as homosexuality in that most decent Catholic country. I know that because Father O'Gara our parish priest told us so. It was something you found in England. But frankly, my dear Mary, what better can you expect from the English? Now if someone tells me he/she is a Protestant, well, that is different. And from where I am sitting at present this was a thoroughly enjoyable read. | Ah, dear Witzl... Written by Talisker (1320 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | How thou dost tripeth thyself with your logical and PC meanderings. You know very well I'm a libertarian and an atheist. I find no contradiction in my views, but in yours; Firstly, homosexuality is genetic (perhaps in many cases, though I actually know of people who practiced it as an experience thing), yet homosexuals "opt" not to have children. Surely, if you have no wish to have sex with the opposite gender, then it is a de facto that you won't procreate. No? So there's no need to "opt" - unless you are "opting" for homosexuality. How authoritative is your 1 in 10 - and "always"? How long have figures existed? Is this a Mori poll? And how do you know that there is not a genetic predisposition in some to Paedophilia, or kleptomania? And I suppose in your rosy world, the gay population had no part in the Aids epidemic? Like I say, I'm no geneticist, it may be a "physical" trait, as you say. But so is baldness, incontinence and cancer, we still try to cure those, and certainly don't celebrate them. Just a debate though. Don't let it get heated! Oli | Good and Bad Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3291 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Leaving the sexual politcis aside, which Talisker should have done, ( I'm not homophobe, he says- sure, sweetie sure; it shows in every word you wrote) this was an odd tale. I grant it was well written as is most of your work but I didn't connect with the couple. I felt you were telling us we had to like teh couple without telling us why. They seemed a bit underwritten. Having said that the structure of the story was very professionally done. Setting everything up and paying off each point to make a clever ending -in teh style of Tom Sharpe I thought. The thing is it would have worked as well if they had not been lesbians but a good story with a satisfying ending. You don't often see that sort of good plotting in this forum. I applaud it. clever stuff. BBS
| Enjoyable Written by Fledermaus (3230 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Funny. For the story it wouldn't have mattered if your characters were gay or not, but because you made them lesbian, some people seem to focus on that rather than on the story. Honestly, if you hadn't mentioned the reason why, I would have considered a superfluous detail, nothing more, nothing less. That said, I think it's an enjoyable story. I'm just curious if yakuza would actually pick foreigner victims, considering all the attention which that'd draw. A good story and who cares if the heroes are lesbians and the villains men?
| Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Hang on here while I dust off my soapbox . . . Oli, baldness is neutral. It may be inherited, but it can't hurt anyone like cancer, or inconvenience like incontinence. And AIDS was certainly spread by gay men, but in sub-Saharan African countries it has spread like wildfire, and generally by heterosexual contact. Whether gay or straight, sex is pretty popular and I don't think we should pin AIDS on any one group. I've often fallen afoul of the PC crowd myself, for various piddling offences. I despise people who follow trends mindlessly, which many people who put PC before common sense do. I'm not getting up on my soapbox (where I can admittedly often be found) because I am pandering to the politically correct, but because I think that people who prefer to pair up with their own gender ought to have the same legal and moral rights as those who pair up with the opposite sex. Gerard, I know that what you say is in jest, but amusingly enough, all nationalities like to point to others as being hotbeds of homosexuality. In Japan, there is a lot of denial -- 'Americans have plenty of gays because American women are too strong' is something I've heard more than once. In San Francisco, great Mecca of gayness, you will find all nationalties represented. I was flabbergasted on my first day at university to see a Navajo Indian (see! I don't say 'Native American!') got up in drag, passing out leaflets for a 'Gay Native American Club.' The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, got up as full-fledged nuns, were the Catholic S & M club. There was a Gay Asian club as well and -- welll, you get the picture. BBS, I agree with you -- these two are not as well-rounded as they ought to be, and they could have been gay or straight or asexual. Fledermaus, I could tell you some pretty horrific yakuza stories. I do know an American who was badly beaten by yakuza, along with a Japanese taxi driver. Their only crime was to be in the wrong place at the wrong time; most yakuza leave foreigners alone. Okay -- off my soapbox now. Thank you very much everyone, for reading and commenting and giving me your much welcome and useful opinions. | Readable Written by Snodlander (501 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | As you have said, the characters were a little too black and white, but an agreeable read all the same. And as for baldness, I wouldn't take a cure if it was offered to me on the NHS. No plugs no rugs no drugs. My baldness is part of me, and I celebrate it no more nor less than any other attribute. How dare you Oli link it with problem attributes like incontinence? How dare you Witzl claim it is nuetral. Let me say it loud and proud! I am bald, and I am beautiful. If neither of you can see that, then that is your problem, not mine! | Baldness can't hurt... Written by Talisker (1320 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Perhaps it doesn't hurt me or Snodders, but speak to an alopecia sufferer. "shouldn't pin aids on any one group" - no, you're right let's settle on three groups viz, gay males, intravenous drug abusers and the sexually promiscuous. To deny that is to deny reality. Next you'll say we should pin bird flu on the birds Oli | Locks of Love Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | Good for you, Snodlander, and shame on me for accusing you of being neutral. My husband is bald and proud of it too -- none of that bar code nonsense for him, pitiful little stray locks teased just so over a shiny bald pate. He's been a Yul Brenner look-alike ever since we got married and I wouldn't have him any other way. As for alopecia, Oli, there is a wonderful society in Florida called 'Locks of Love' that makes wigs of human hair for alopecia sufferers (sometimes children who have had hair loss from radiotherapy too). I have an odd hobby: I grow my hair very long, chop it off periodically, and donate it to them! In fact, I have an arrangement with the local hairdressers: they save me 10" ponytails from whenever some girl or woman has decided to get shorn, and I package it up and send it to Locks of Love. You would not believe how many Scottish ponytails I have sent to Florida. Weird, isn't it? Must be my Mohawk heritage trying to find a pacifist way of expressing itself. Oops -- that'll get me a ticket from the PC folks for sure! Now, weren't we talking about AIDS and sexuality. . .? | Written by ellipinnock (1753 comments posted) 13th November 2006 | I knew someone was going to bring science into this one...so I have a couple of contributions to make... Homosexuality is not a genetic aberration, there is clear evidence, albeit not widely publicised, that there is a clear genetic basis for homosexuality (leaving aside the experimenters) in fact, it would probably be possible, although in no way desirable, to produce a pre-birth test... Likewise, HIV is not spread merely by gays, drug addicts and promiscuous people (although the activities of these groups do have a disproportionate effect on transmission). If we were all heterosexual, didn't use drugs and limited ourselves to low numbers of sexual partners, HIV would still be spreading and, at some point in the future, would most likely result in an AIDS epidemic. It is these kinds of prejudices and misinformation that contribute to the spread of the disease and the stigmatisation of certains social groups. So please can we steer clear of the pseudo-scientific clap trap, it should never be used in an attempt to justify a personal view. Down off the soapbox. As regards the piece, I enjoyed it. Yes, it was a little black and white no more so than many other pieces on the site. I also thought it pretty well-written and not particularly controversial to my mind.
Elli | Elli!!! Written by Talisker (1320 comments posted) 14th November 2006 | I can't let that one go! There is NO incontrovertible evidence of a "gay gene" or any other "physical" predisposition to homosexuality. You could quote Simon LeVays results regarding size of the hypothalmus in relative groups. The results were based on only 41 individuals and have been widely discredited. What about the Bailey/Pillard studies of homosexuality in twins, which found that 50% of identical twins did not share sexual orientation? Dr.Hamer conducted inconclusive research in 1993 to identify a "gay" gene. Although he found a common gene in 33 pairs of gay brothers, it was absent in another 7 pairs. Doctor Hamer has admitted since that this is flimsy evidence, especially since the presence of the gene is no guarantee of causation. Perhaps you have other more authoratitive research results which you wish to make public? The ironic thing is that there is ONLY "pseudo scientific claptrap" to suggest a genetic predisposition to homosexuality! I have no firm views either way, probably its a bit nature, a bit nurture. But I won't be accused of ignoring scientific evidence. Finally, to deny the overwhelming role (disregarding sub-saharan Africa) that Gay males, introvenous drug users and the promiscuous (social groups?) have had in spreading HIV, is the only PC claptrap here. I'll give anyone who wants it the last word. Oli
| Written by ellipinnock (1753 comments posted) 14th November 2006 | Incontrovertible evidence no and any genetic basis would have to be multifactorial therefore the likelihod of testing any gene involved with homosexuality and finding it present in 100% of gay men is small. And yes, the Hamer study was not conclusive but the results were statistically significant. Whilst there are likely to be other causes I would be amazed to find that it was truly independent of genetics. As for PC claptrap, I am not denying the importance of the factors in the spread of HIV but to suggest that they are the only factors at play is also untrue. Anyway, no more on this from me! Elli ps. Sorry witzl! | Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3291 comments posted) 14th November 2006 | "I'll give anyone who wants it the last word". Oli Zymurgy | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 14th November 2006 | No, no, no -- you're wrong! Zyrian. | Written by ellipinnock (1753 comments posted) 14th November 2006 | zzzzzzzz  | Hot Water Indeed! Written by johniebg (538 comments posted) 14th November 2006 | Who would have thought a competent story such as this would generate such heated discussion! It seems that regardless a stories worth, as long as it is about religion and homosexuality then your on for a huge number of hits and comments. Keep your eye out for my next piece; 'My gay lover Jesus"'. I might even throw in some animal cruelty just to cover all bases, sure I read somewhere the messiah owned a poodle!!
| Written by Phil (6632 comments posted) 18th November 2006 | Hi Witzl. Just a quick review of your story. I lked it. Someone mentioned (between rant and counter rant) that your characters were a little more black and white than usual. Probably true - but an enjoyable story all the same. On other issues, no problems here. All the best, Phil. |
Only registered users can rate and write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |