Great Writing - Home > Non-Fiction > EU constitution
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1099 guests online and 3 members online
Non-Fiction
EU constitution
By Fledermaus
17 January 2007
Angela Merkel just did something stupid...

At may 29, 2005, the French rejected the European constitution, at june 1, the Dutch did the same. Thereupon Tony Blair decided that a referendum in the UK was unnecessary, probably because he was afraid of a British 'no', rather than because of any of the excuses he made up. For the 'non' and 'nee' were of course a blow in the face of the French and Dutch politicians and Tony had already angered many Britons by sending their sons and daughters to Iraq.
I understood that the European constitution is just a formality. The treaties are already there and this constitution is going to be a nice summary of what's already been achieved. It's not the American 'bill of rights', nor anything spectacular like the 'declaration of human rights'. It's just a pile of paper created to bring some order into the European chaos.

I don't think there's anything wrong with bringing order into chaos, or with drafting something like a constitution. Europe has a lot of potential. It has the third largest population of the world, the largest economy, a tremendous military and political potential and a huge legacy. And besides those things, it has been a beacon of peace for more than half a century.

But what does annoy me and convince me to vote against another proposed constitution is the way in which it is presented. The politicians held these referenda, hoping to show Brussels that 'their' people were so enlightened to embrace this symbol of hope and unity. They thought it'd be an easy victory. And, just so that the brainless electorate would know which button to press, they started a campaign.
The message was clear: "Vote yes!"
I don't know how much of the tax-payers' money they spent on it, but it must have been an awful lot. Television, newspapers, folders, everything was used to convince us ignorant civilians to vote in favour. The only thing they didn't show us was the draft constitution itself.

One Dutch politician summarized the shock of the politicians the next day... " The voter is intelligent."
Of course the reaction of most people was: "Arrogant idiot."
But at least this gentleman had woken up. Yes, politicians, we do have brains. We aren't stupid sheep who vote 'yes' because you tell us to. If you wanted a 'yes' so desperately, why did you have a referendum in the first place? You remind me of the governments of the former Deutsche DEMOKRATISCHE Republik, which held elections with just one name printed on the voting-paper. Very democratic, dear politicians...
I suspect that many French and Dutch didn't cast their 'nons' and 'nees' because they were opposed to the European constitution, nor even because they were opposed to European unity, but simply because the politicians kept telling them that it would be such a shame and a disgrace if they voted 'no'.
A shame and a disgrace... For them politicians, not for us voters. We wanted to see them tumble from their arrogant height, to show tham that democracy isn't a tool one can abuse for his own purposes.
And the night after, many politicians kept their attitude. The voter had misunderstood them. The ignorant plebs didn't know the importance of this constitution. The naive fools...

Well, let me tell you this Europhilic politicians: I have nothing against the EU, nor against your constitution, but if you keep telling me to vote 'yes', I will vote 'no'.

And yes, chancelor Merkel, it was a missed opportunity. Not for Europe, but for you.

Reviews
bravo!
Written by fellpony (1656 comments posted) 17th January 2007
well said Fledermaus ... nicely rounded beginning and end and I liked that biting phrase, "if you keep telling me to vote 'yes' I will vote 'no'." 

Written by Fledermaus (3448 comments posted) 17th January 2007
Thanks fellpony. I'm sure that if Blair went ahead, the British would have voted 'no' too.

Written by Phil (6838 comments posted) 18th January 2007
They would, but not because they would have been told to vote no, but because most don't really want a close union. I quite like the idea of Europe, but everything I read about it (and not from the British right wing press) makes me shudder. I don't think they (EU parliament etc) could organise a children's party, let alone a continent. A united Europe seems like a nice idea, but not with that lot running it. 
 
Enjoyed your piece. A well rounded a strucured essay. 
 
Phil (Yorkshire Independence Party - Lancashire Branch!)

Written by Fledermaus (3448 comments posted) 19th January 2007
Thanks Phil. I guess you're right. If they can spent days of debating the colour of headlights or the sales of chocolate sigarettes, I doubt if they can be taken seriously.  
Still, having heard the explanations of some students of European law, I'm not realy opposed to this constitution, but I am opposed to the way in which it is forced upon us. It seems to me like the EU is beginning to look like an echo of the Warshaw Pact.

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item