I have revised this, incorporating some of your suggestions. If you can be bothered, do read it again and let me know if you think it's any better.
LuAnn ran the back of her hand over her forehead and peered out the window again. What was Sophie doing out there in this heat? She’d been outside for ages now, squatting over something. Digging, maybe: she’d come into the kitchen earlier, looking for her spade. But why was she digging there in the driveway – on that spot, of all places? Why wasn’t she digging in the sandpit? And for pity’s sake, digging? In this heat? Leaning over the sink, she pulled the curtains aside and hollered. ‘What’re you doing out there, honey?’ Sophie stared up at her for a moment, then turned back to her work, pouring water from a jug into the the hole she had dug. Sighing, LuAnn put down her sponge and went outside. ‘Excuse me young lady, I believe I asked what you were doing.’ For a moment, Sophie said nothing. Then she looked up at her mother again. ‘I’m giving the people in hell a drink.’ It sounded so funny, coming from an eight-year-old, that LuAnn almost burst out laughing. But Sophie’s face was so full of dogged determination as she hunched there, her small hand gripping the scoop, that LuAnn checked herself. She wondered why Sophie had picked that very spot; could someone have told her about that night when her daddy had driven home so drunk he couldn’t even remember that her sister’s car was in the driveway? The family made a point of not talking about the accident; Sophie knew her daddy and her Auntie Jill had died, but that was about it.
LuAnn watched Sophie dig. The ground was hard: packed earth tangled with roots and small stones; she could see the sweat beading up on the back of her neck. It was possible Sophie'd overheard something. Afterwards everyone had said that for all that it was a tragedy, two young people dying like that, they ought to look on the bright side. God had given them two miracles: one, that Sophie was staying at her grandma’s that night -- twenty minutes earlier and she'd have been in the car with her Auntie Jill; two, that Jim managed to make it home without killing anyone along the way. ‘LuAnn decided to play along. 'You don't need to dig, honey. Just wait for it to rain and the sinners will have plenty.’ Sophie shrugged and frowned. ‘Takes too long that way.’ This was true; the drought had been going on for months. ‘But wh-’ began LuAnn, then she stopped. Last Sunday’s sermon had been more hellfire-and-damnation than usual. It could be a little scary for a child to hear something like that, but a little fear was surely a good thing. You wanted children to know that there were lines they shouldn’t cross, wanted them to know right from wrong. She stared down at Sophie for a few moments, then sighed. If only knowing right from wrong was enough to keep you in God’s grace. Jim had known right from wrong, and where had that gotten him? Sophie continued to dig. LuAnn reached down and smoothed the hair out of her face. 'You come inside when I call you for lunch, you hear?’ 'Mama?' said Sophie over lunch. 'Mmm?' 'You know how Brother Dougal says that people who haven't received the light have to go to hell? LuAnn looked up from her plate. 'Uh huh?' 'Well, what if they're little babies. And no one's ever told them about Jesus.' LuAnn picked up her plate and walked over to the sink. 'I'm not sure about that one, honey, I think you'll have to ask Brother Dougal.' 'But I did and he says that they have to burn in hell just the same.' LuAnn put down her plate. 'I didn't make the world, honey. Some things just aren't fair, but scripture says . . .' Her voice trailed off.
Sophie got up from the table. 'I'm finished,' she said, though she'd hardly touched her black eyed peas. LuAnn called out to her, but it was no use. The next time she looked out the window, Sophie was back at her digging.
Later that evening, LuAnn made sure that Sophie went to bed early. Tomorrow was Sunday and it always seemed to be a struggle to get to church on time. When she went back into Sophie’s room for their evening chat, she had already fallen asleep. LuAnn sighed. The days were so hectic and she was so busy; it was hard to find the time to sit down and talk with Sophie like they had in the old days when Jim had still been with them. She stood looking down for a moment, then reached out to stroke Sophie’s cheek. Sophie’s lashes were long – like her father’s – and her dark hair was already pasted to her forehead, damp from the heat. She seemed to be frowning in her sleep, her eyebrows drawn together as though she were trying to figure something out. She couldn’t help it if she looked just like her father, poor baby! And she couldn’t help it that she missed him either, even though she’d been only five when he died. None of this was Sophie’s fault, but having a father like that – well, it was all the more reason that she needed to go to church, needed a firm hand in life. Leaving the room, she saw the glittery purple and pink diary Sophie had wanted for Christmas. She stood and looked at it for a moment, hesitating. Surely a mother had a right to know what her own daughter was worried about -- what she would want to confide in a diary. It wasn't as though she was snooping, really; it was more that she wanted to know what was on her daughter's mind. Glancing over at the bed, she picked it up and leafed through the pages. Sophie hadn’t managed to write every day, but she had written quite a bit all the same. January 12: Auntie Sue tole Uncle Phil that Daddys burning in hell. March 19: Brother Dougal says that all sinners burn in hell for ever and ever. April 2: Mrs Bell says that sinners shall be cast into hellfire and their thirst shall never be quinched. They will be parched and dry and endure internal tornment. May 23: Uncle Phil said he will never forgive Daddy. Mrs Bell says you have to forgive people, especially sinners. LuAnn put the diary down and leaned against the wall. She stared across the room at her sleeping daughter, her small form bathed in moonlight. All this time Sophie had sat there next to her, listening to those sermons. Hellfire and damnation -- all those sinners burning up in hell, thirsting for ever and ever with no salvation in sight. Brother Dougal talked so much about forgiveness and redemption, but there was no mistaking the satisfaction he got from describing the unending torment all of those sinning nonbelievers were destined to suffer.
She put the diary back and sat down next to Sophie, smoothing her forehead with one hand. Perhaps they wouldn’t go to church in the morning after all. |
Well put together Written by richard (88 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | Witzl, Specific comments. 1. Good title. 2. In the "it sounded so funny" paragraph it might be worth emphasising that the father is killed. It is clear when you re-read it, but first time through it isn't. 3. Could possiby use a stronger opening line - maybe rather than gong with LuAnn wiping her forehead have a line about Sophie's digging - somthing that immediately grabs attantion and makes reader wonder what it is that is going on. 4.I wonder if you need a reason for LuAnn to look through the diary? e.g Sophie normally highly protective of it so a surprise it is lying out? As it reads it's a bit of a surprise she looks at it. 5.Wonder about the order of the diary entries - maybe the entry about thirst could be the most recent - thus inspiring the digging? 6.Wonder if there is more could be done with the story - esp the impact of the incident on Lu Ann - can it be done in such a way as to cause her to forgive Sophie's father (who I assumed was her husband)? 7.Could possibly use a stronger punchier ending? Lots of good ideas - you could really make something out of the story. You write well too - but everyone tells you that! Hope it helps Richard | HI Witzl Written by jean.day (2286 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | Interesting story. Poor child to not only lose her father but to have to live with the notion that he is burning in hell. As usual, religion and religious teachers have a lot to answer for. I don't think I believe in Hell. Because I think that so much of who we are and what we do is given to us both genetically and through our environment and upbringing, that I don't think that anyone can be completely to blame for what they have done. So I don't think Hitler, who no doubt was a bad man and deserved to go to Hell, should be without the offer of redemption or a chance to try to do better in another life. I think reincarnation is a very interesting concept. In the book Jonathan Livingston Seagull, that theory is put forth. You can promote your ability to do bettr if you choose to, over and over and over, and eventually you might get to the stage where you've achieved perfection. However, I do believe that man, whether he believes in heaven and hell or not, has a responsibility to act as well as possible in life - and make decisions that he is then accountable for. I'm not sure I believe in most people's idea of heaven either, but I certainly believe in an after life.
| Written by johniebg (541 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | I have to say I pretty much agree with Richards comments. It does annoy me when a story, especially a short story starts by referencing someone as you do by name - you do it twice before we have chance to draw breath. Somehow you feel like your catching up from the get go, and although I loved the concept of the little girl trying to give her dad water while he was in hell, got lost in the detail. A little rearranging and you could have given us some characteristics before the names. I did not think the dad was dead, it was too vague, needed affirmation. I think that is probably why I struggle so much with your fictional short stories, because they are written as if they were part of a larger whole, such as a book, where you have time to ponder and elaborate, where in a short story you have to achieve everything more economically. Loved the idea and the message. I could discuss the moral of this at length but if I start on that I will overstay my welcome. | Written by Snodlander (501 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | Nice idea, trying to give her Daddy a drink. Kids can take things so literally (though not things like what time to be back home). I wasn't confused about her Dad dying. That seemed clear enough to me. I wonder though, why so many of her family wanted him to burn in hell. I think that would have been more understandable if her sister had in fact been killed by him. Maybe crashing the car with her as a passenger, as pulling onto a driveway seems a little tame to cause a fatal crash. Oh, wait. He did kill her sister, didn't he. Sorry, I missed that on the first read. That would explain it a lot more. Sorry, but I think that that needs to be made a tad more explicit. Otherwise up to your usual high standard. (I'm assuming the diary typos are deliberate. Love the idea of internal tornment. That would be hell, sure enough) | Miao Shan Written by Fledermaus (3321 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | A sweet story, with a painful end. After reading a few lines I was reminded of the legend of princess Miao Shan. Perhaps you already know it. It's about an incarnation of Guan Yin, who wants to become a nun rather than marry. Anyhow, on one of her adventures, she ends up in hell, where she enlightens the lost souls. Thereupon the king of hell sent her back to earth, because she was turning hell into paradise Like some of the people above I think you could have done more with this story though. The history of the child's father and mother is a bit under-developed... | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | I am thrilled with all of these good suggestions and can't wait to get started on incorporating some of them. Thank you, everyone -- as always, your input is much appreciated. I've had this idea since I was about five years old. My older sister went straight outside after church one afternoon (we attended three times a week, oh the wasted hours) with a beaker of water and a spade and dug and poured alternately for the better part of an hour. It was a hot day and my mother asked her what she was doing whereupon my sister answered that she was giving the sinners in hell a drink. That is what prompted my mother to leave the church she'd grown up in; she'd already lost faith in the doctrine but had hung on because of her family. All the rest is fiction; the story isn't enough as a vignette.
| Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3369 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | I enjoyed this and thought it a well judged piece. I always think dialogue in a story gives it "sparkle" ,providing it's good . At it's best it is spotlight on character and yours did just that. I came to the same conclusion as Snoddy about him killing the sister. The ending did seem to be a bit abrupt and also a change of direction, for me. I didn't expect you to end with the church. I would have like more and to be taken back to the relationship between the two but I think I can see the point you wanted to make cheers J | Written by NeilTollfree (51 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | I love concept of a kid giving the poeple in hell a drink..it's really strong and original. I thought you were going to go off on a bit of a supernatural tack (bit of a Stephen King fan, me) so was suprised at where this story ended up. Like others though, I'm a little confused (second review I've written about being confused. Me Dense) Are both Sister and husband dead ? | I've revised this. . . Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | | Thank you Jane and NeilTollfree -- and everyone else who has reviewed this. I've rewritten this and made it less ambiguous. I'm always afraid of being too heavy-handed with information. This is something I always used to do -- really laid it on thick and then laid it on again, explaining far too much -- and now of course I overcompensate for this problem by putting in too little. | Written by Phil (6738 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | Am I the first to review after the rewrite - I assume so becuase all was perfectly clear to me. Lovely concept. Ending: For a short it was perfectly good, but I can see where some of the comments have come from. Johnie suggests you seem to write all you shorts as if they are a part of something bigger - I disagree - but on this occasion, I think it's almost crying out to be extended. Although this sounds critical, it's also testament to the quality of the writing that went before the end - we want more. Phil. | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | Thank you, Phil. When I wrote this, I thought about your own story about your family's religious faith and how hard it was for you. That reminded me a little of my family; my parents (my mother, really) broke away from the Church of Christ, and this had such repercussions in our lives. Every time I try to write about the Church of Christ, though, I cannot do it properly. This incident has remained with me for decades. I really would like to write more, but wonder if I could. Throughout my childhood, I always felt grateful to my sister for digging that hole. In fact, my mother would have left the church no matter what had happened, but my sister's drink of water for the sinners really gave her the push she needed. | HI Mary Written by jean.day (2286 comments posted) 20th February 2007 | | I've reread it too, and now that I have read your comments, it all fits together for me. | Written by Snodlander (501 comments posted) 21st February 2007 | Parfait! Much better with those two tiny comments about Aunty Jill. I'm now really struggling to come up with a criticism. Maybe ' right from wrong, good from evil' could be cut to just 'good from evil', but it is such a minor point. Great story. | Written by johniebg (541 comments posted) 21st February 2007 | Firstly - Might be an idea if a story gets a fairly major revision, as this seems to, to put something in the title so we know it is revised. I only clicked again as I saw it had a few more comments and was interested to know what others were saying. Maybe Hope in Hell (Revised) or something, or a version number, I don't know, but I almost missed this change. It reads a lot better, I found myself subconsciously wanting more detail on the two deaths so I could make judgement myself. Throughout I was kind of wondering whether LuAn was her mother as she seems to refer to the little girl fairly dispassionately right through to the end, when she states she is her daughter and you feel some of the compassion. Not sure if this is designed. Sometimes when you write it feels like I am being told the story rather than being involved within it. Not always but a good example of this is the following; Sophie stared up at her for a moment, then turned back to her work. There was a pitcher of water next to her. Sighing, LuAnn pushed the boxes out of her way and went outside. This is story telling, however changing the sentence so that Sophie stared up at her for a moment then reached across to the pitcher and poured water into the mud and continuing to dig, involves the reader more into the story while also letting the reader know that the pitcher was there. Anyways, just a thought. Happy tapping, I love the premise for this. It infuriates me at how the blind following of religion traumatises the growing mind so, which is what it is designed to do, but I digress. Bad Johnie. | Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3369 comments posted) 21st February 2007 | Iv'e just come back to this and re-read it. I'm genuinely suprised at what a difference a few changes can make. I thought the ending was so much more complete [for want of a better word] and somehow more visual.The meaning and theme are much clearer,as well JBG's point applies to lot of writers and one easy way to bring the reader in is dialogue, which you have an ear for.You can add it in without re-jigging the story too much. I feel I'm stepping beyond my brief in advising you how to write though. It's just a reaction cheers J | Didn't manage to read First Draft .... Written by Bagheera (683 comments posted) 21st February 2007 | ... but thoroughly enjoyed this version ("Second Draft"?) I thought the balance just about right, so can only think that this worked well for me and should work as well for others. I don't think there's too much info, nor do I feel there's too little. | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 21st February 2007 | Once again, grateful thanks to all. Reading over this story, I am again struck by how much I have gotten from this website. I started out with the nucleus of an idea and embellished it a little, then posted the story. At the time, I was 80% satisfied with it. Then I read everyone's comments, thought about them all overnight, and rewrote a few parts of the story, incorporating a few of the ideas I got from my reviewers. The result is a story that I am 95% satisfied with, and I have GW to thank for that. Thank you, everyone. I'll probably nip and tuck a little more after a good face-saving period of time, just so it doesn't look as though I have no will of my own. | Good start Written by bwoz (125 comments posted) 21st February 2007 | Witz Nice story, it has a lot of common "feelings" to it (we hate that word). what I mean is the reader can easily related to and empathize with the actions that take place. The only really constructive comment I can add at this point is that there is a lot of passive voice writing. For example: "it was hard to find the time to sit down and talk with Sophie like they had in the old days when Jim had still been with them." You can easily remove the word "had" to move the sentence into present/active voice. In fact, everywhere you use the word 'had' take a close look at how you can re-write that section to remove 'had" because that word is usually followed by a very passive word, or else it is followed by a perfectly good "active" word that doesn't need a qualifier. Once the passiveness is minimized this story will move along at a better pace, I think. The passive voice tends to slow the action down, makes the reading seem like it has speed bumps. Also, if possible maybe extend the characterization of the little girl a little more. I sense that she is a very independent, tough minded (if somewhat confused) little darling with a lot of personality. Nice story, BW | Written by coosh (868 comments posted) 22nd February 2007 | | I also missed the first draft, but I'm with Bagheera as regards the balance. Liked the "water" idea... and still think it could be developed into something more extended. | Late to this.... Written by woody44 (775 comments posted) 22nd February 2007 | Sorry I didn`t get round to reading the first draft Mary but this seems to work as a short, self-contained piece of work with an intriguing beginning, an establishing middle and a quite satisfying ending. Like a lot of writing it is difficult to know when to `round it off` but for me you ended it just at the right point. A thoughtful piece of work and a very enjoyable read.. happy writing Woody | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 22nd February 2007 | Thank you all so much. I do think I rushed through the mother's epiphany and I would have liked to draw that out a little more. But I am not sure that would be the best thing for a short story. If I ever wanted to make this into something longer, though, I have plenty of memories that would serve as material. | Written by peeano1 (86 comments posted) 22nd February 2007 | | omg! so many comments! i was going to mention some things but a lot of ppl took what i was going to say. so..all i need to say now is that this is really good and is a thoughtful piece of work. very enjoyable and neat. good job! | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 22nd February 2007 | Thank you, peeano1. Have you thought about entering something in that competition yet? | Written by ellipinnock (1753 comments posted) 24th February 2007 | I too thought this a very strong piece. Powerful and self contained although it hints at so much more. Not a lot more to say that hasn't already been said other than I thought it an excellent read. Elli | Written by Witzl (1585 comments posted) 24th February 2007 | | Thank you, Elli! | Written by Lizzy (806 comments posted) 9th March 2007 | | Have just read the revised story (didn't read original). Enjoyed it. I got the idea that Dad and Mum's sister were having an affair and that's why they should burn in hell. I liked the way a reader can interpret this story and get into the minds of the characters. |
Only registered users can rate and write comments. Please login or register. Powered by AkoComment 2.0! |