|
| READING ROOM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| COMMUNITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ABOUT GREAT WRITING | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| WORK AWAITING REVIEW |
|---|
|
| GW IS... |
|---|
|
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas
and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur
authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry
Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you
can make new friends and improve your creative writing. |
| WHO'S ONLINE |
|---|
| We have 2018 guests online and 7 members online |
| print friendly version | |
| Auntie Occident & The Free Radicals Debut CD | |
| By DickPeligro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 March 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bay Area feminist quintet hits NYC |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reviews |
Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3351 comments posted) 22nd March 2007 |
| I think I saw them supporting the Scissor Sisters in Nottinham last year. They were doing well till the fat one got her tits caught in the accordian, the set never really recovered from that. I take it you saw the photo and made up the whole thing. A really funny and cheeky bit of writing staying juuuust this side of plausible. The style and presentation of it was spot on. Really wonderful stuff, you have my unqualified admiration cheers J |
| Zzzzz Written by Moonglum (15 comments posted) 22nd March 2007 |
|
Written by Phil (6713 comments posted) 22nd March 2007 |
| Very well written and carefully presented. A work of quality, and yet I can't say I was really that taken by it. It might be more to do with me. I came to this expecting a laugh a minute. What you deliver is good quality 'clever' humour - not funnies. Hope this makes sense. If that's what you were aiming for - and I'm sure you were - my review should be despatched to the waste pile. Phil. |
| You once asked... Written by stevetroster (1549 comments posted) 23rd March 2007 |
| ...what it was that you should learn from BBS. A) Side splitting, belly aching, tears in your eyes humour. I want you to nuke me with your humour, but at present your cruise does make me snooze. Less pictures and more laughs please. From one Dick to another, Best wishes but I'm with Moonglum on this one. |
| I do what I do Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 23rd March 2007 |
| Moonglum -- I once read, somewhere, one writer saying that no real writer can learn anything from any other writer. I d what I do, just like Jane does what she does. I'm not a yuck-yuck kid of writer. I wish I could; f I were. maybe I'd be a screen writer in Hollywood or be on the staff of David Letterman. If you want side-splitting, tears-in-the-eyes stuff, I'm afraid i won't be able to give it to you. I model myself after folks like H.L. Mencken and Graham Green, who write sly, dry satire. I'm also a former journalist who has discovered how important graphics are in certain contexts -- and what I do is very much pseudo-journalism. Sorry -- I've heard far too many people (e.g. Bottleblondesurfer) tell me that they like my stuff. Those who know me have said what I do is a unique schtick, and moreover one well-suited for my particular abilities & experience (former college professor & newspaperman). You, Moonglum and others critics have a perfect right to find my writing not to their liking -- however, I believe have found my own best formula and intend to stick to it and develop it. |
| Sayeth the Bard... Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 23rd March 2007 |
| Excuse the typos -- I haven't yet had my morning coffee. I just wanted to add that telling any writer what one wants him to do doesn't seem, well, quite cricket, as you Brits say. Not to compare myself to The Greats, but people like Joyce and Beckett didn't become what they were by doing what people wanted them to do; they did it by following their own Muse. I'm not a nuke-style humorist, and to quote The Greatest of therm all: "To thine own self remain true." Please don't ask me, or expect me to do what I cannot. |
Written by Phil (6713 comments posted) 24th March 2007 |
| A good riposte. Phil. |
| Why use 2 concise words... Written by Moonglum (15 comments posted) 24th March 2007 |
| when you can drone on for hours! Your defensive posts are like your work. "I've heard far too many people (e.g. Bottleblondesurfer) tell me that they like my stuff." Shame you don't return the compliment sometimes. How many revues have you done (1). You are a person who posts his work expecting praise to be heaped upon him, and when you don't get it....well you go all American. How many positive revues do you get these days? Perhaps people are tired of your (sly, dry satire.) As for me, I'm off now. Too many prima donnas for my liking. |
| Well, well, Moonglum ... Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 24th March 2007 |
| ... I certainly won't descend to the level of the xenophobic remarks in which you indulge, Moonglum, nor will I remark on your rather striking admission that it takes you two hours to read a three or four paragraphs, but I will say I'm disappointed that you've decided to go "ad homimem" and criticize me personally, as opposed to my writing -- which, it seems to me, is not in the best spirit of peer review). I've been on this site less than a month, not much time to read very much of the worthy material on here, or to submit thoughtful, helpful reviews -- which, in my view. are the only sort worth inflicting on a general readership (as opposed to, say, a snooze smiley, which is not exactly my idea of an articulate critique). It has, however, been enough time to garner a few positive reviews, as can be seen, from Phil, BBS and a couple others. Incidentally, have sent a couple of PMs to individuals, either in response to a nice remark they've made or to pay a compliment to their work; of course, you're not privy to those, and I would suggest that you are thus speaking from a less-than-knowledgeable position. Similarly, you are no position to know what my expectations are; I can assure you that I am not out to receive adoring accolades, nor am I unreceptive to constructive criticism. However, I must repeat that writers worth their salt understand what they can and cannot do, and write accordingly. By all means, please feel free to avoid my work in the future. And as we say over here in the Colonies: have a nice day, dude! |
Written by LynB (435 comments posted) 24th March 2007 |
| Hi Dick. For what it's worth, I love your style of work - it is indeed unique, and very cleverly done. I agree that writers understand what they can and cannot do. I know that my forte is what you might call dramatic fiction - can't think of a better description! However, I know I could not do anything like this, but I admire your ability to do so. I hope you will keep posting! Best wishes. |
Written by anorwegianwood (278 comments posted) 26th March 2007 |
| I enjoyed reading your responses on here almost as much as the work itself. Really good stuff here, in my opinion. ~Claire |
| An Appreciation Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 27th March 2007 |
| Dear Ladies & Gentlemen (a salutation which, of course, is not necessarily all-inclusive), I would be remiss indeed if I didn't express my gratitude for the very gracious and altogether supportive remarks that individuals such as BBS, Phil, LynB, Claire & others have made. Among other things, I'm an erstwhile semi-pro jazz pianist, and I've found that receiving any sort of praise from a fellow musician is somehow sweeter than that from an ordinary listener (although that's very nice too). In the same way, it's particularly pleasant to read positive remarks from others with the intestinal fortitude to attempt the devilishly difficult task of arranging words on paper (or a computer screen) in such fashion as to be worth the time of others to peruse. I intend to send a few individuals a PM to respond and amplify privately, but I would like to make a general remark here to all. My Significant Other, Kathryn (herself a professional writer, albeit it in a scientific context) serves not only as an invaluable sounding board and career coach, but also as (to use Abraham Lincoln's sublime term) an Angel of my Better Nature. She's cautioned me not to allow one or two unpleasant individuals to unduly color my perception & attitude vis-vis the 'Great Writing' Community. As usual, she's right. In principle, I've always railed against holding an entire group responsible for the actions of a few, and I'm not going to be guilty of that here. Incidentally, Phil & Claire, as a lifetime reader of such publications as the NY and London 'Review of Books,' I've come to feel that the authorial riposte qualifies as a literary sub-category in its own right, one that can attain the level of an art form in the right hands. I can scarcely hope to achieve the degree of mastery seen, for example, in the brilliant sparring between Bernard Shaw and Oscar Wilde, but I like to flatter myself that in a battle of wits, I'm not an unarmed man. One other note: I don't care to annoy anyone by making excuses, not do I wish to bore anyone unduly with a detailed explanation, but a combination of personal and professional matters (such as paying the rent & putting food on the table, as well as familial matters) have been somewhat time-consuming recently and more than a little distracting. That, Friends, is why I have been so laggard with respect to contributing reviews thus far. I'm a survivor of 11 years of Catholic school, where I learned two things: how to string a few complete sentences together & how to beat my breast and recite "mea culpas." I hereby admit my failings with regard to my dearth of reviews to date, and I duly swear I will do my utmost to correct them in the very near future. I remain ... Your Humble & Obedient Servant, DP P.S. - I am, by no means, through with Sinead O'Connor ... not by a long shot. |
Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3351 comments posted) 29th March 2007 |
| I too survived a Catholic education and have the scars[and a few good tales] to show for it. I didn't know Americans did Catholicism. I thought it was whooping and "praise the lord" generic worship. But ,as you say, it does it does turn out fairly literate, if guilt ridden, people which is why I'm surprised it appeals to Americans. I didn't think they did guilt and breast beating [apart from some specialist clubs in New York]. I find it quietly reassuring- don't know why. Your comment about " the brilliant sparring between Bernard Shaw and Oscar Wilde" reminded me of a spoof of that done by Monty Python which was hilarious. I think Wilde won on a technicality. I'd urge to to hunt it out. It's repeated ad nausium here on cable cheers j |
Only registered users can rate and write comments.
Please login or register.
Powered by AkoComment 2.0!
|
Next item
|
|---|