Great Writing - Home > Not News > Auntie Occident & The Free Radicals Debut CD
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 2018 guests online and 7 members online
Not News
Auntie Occident & The Free Radicals Debut CD
By DickPeligro
21 March 2007
Auntie Occident & The Free Radicals CD cover

Bay Area feminist quintet hits NYC

Debut CD feted

NEW YORK, NY — A reception recently was held at an upscale loft in Manhattan’s chic Soho district to mark the release of a new CD, “Brothers, Let Us Prey,” by an all-woman jazz vocal quintet out of Berkeley, California calling themselves Auntie Occident & The Free Radicals. The glitterati of New York’s alt-indie music scene exchanged hugs, noshed on marinated tofu canapés topped with organic cucumber slices and sipped espresso (”We made sure that the caterer only served Fair Trade coffee,” said Helen Barkin-Bray, a prominent socialite hostessing the soirée) as cuts from the CD played on the sound system.

“Music has galvanized activists during some of modern history’s most revolutionary moments, from gospel chants doubling as hidden messages for runaway slaves to Joan Baez’s rendition of ‘We Shall Overcome’ during the March on Washington,” said Sierra "Auntie" Occident, a San Francisco native who formed the group while she was working on a degree in history at the University of California at Berkeley.

The group employs sophisticated jazz arrangements and lush five-part harmonies on a broad range of material from across the musical spectrum. However, they’ve set out to be much more than a feminist version of Manhattan Transfer. “We don’t sing torch songs about pining over some man; we sing songs about carrying on the torch of human liberation,” said Occident. “And there’s no token chanteuse in a slit skirt providing eye candy for the boys, either,” she added.

Her comment seemed to make Rainbow Skye, another member of the group, a bit uncomfortable. Skye, who favors miniskirts and go-go boots, was practically the only woman in the room not wearing pants. “I suppose you could say I’m what’s called a ‘lipstick feminist,’” she said a trifle defensively. “I don’t think a woman has to surrender her femininity to be empowered; in fact, I think wearing short skirts is a way of celebrating my womanhood,” she noted with a sidelong glance at Occident.

“We want to do for jazz what the Chicago Women’s Liberation Rock Band did for rock’n’roll,” continued Occident, abruptly turning to the buffet table. The CWLRB confronted the grim machismo of “pig rock,” she pointed out, using satire and a diversity of styles to subvert it. “We’re doing that with jazz. Our mission is to survey and comment on contemporary gender politics, its impact on marginalized groups, and advocate for an alternate reality where discrimination does not exist,” she explained.

The title track, “Brothers, Let Us Prey,” is a scathing feminist indictment of the patriarchalism of Judeo-Christian culture and its suppression of Earth Goddess worship over the past two thousand years. “He’s not my father, and he sure ain’t holy,” the band chants, reciting a litany of complaint against the disempowerment of women and their exploitation by organized Western religion.

Sinead rips Pope on SNLThat is not the only jab directed at the Vatican and traditional Christianity, either. “I’m Gonna Shave That Man Right Outta My Hair,” their take on the Rodgers & Hammerstein tune, is inspired by Sinéad O’Connor’s 1992 appearance on “Saturday Nite Live” when she tore up a picture of Pope John Paul II to protest sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. “Sinéad was so brave to do that,” said Julie DiMolition, another band member. “We wanted to let her, and everyone, know how courageous we think that was.”

“I M Wimmin” is an updated cover of the Helen Reddy classic with a hip-hop beat and thick walls of synth-sound, tackling the complexities of modern awareness while reveling in the feel of a mid-70s disco party set somewhere in the future.

“(Look at That) Super Grrrl” is a tongue-in-cheek deconstruction of the Rolling Stones tune “Stupid Girl,” which has long infuriated women who see it as an disparaging insult to their gender. “I guess you could say it’s a joke with a serious point underneath,” said Olive Chancellor, another group member. “We want to show that the prevailing misperception that feminists have no sense of humor simply isn’t true.”

“She Ain’t Heavy (She’s My Sister)” is a tribute to the late “Mama” Cass Elliot, as well as a tender paean to plus-size ladies everywhere, reminding us that true beauty is not in the eyes of the male gaze, but on the inside.

“Yes, we’re pushing the envelope, and we’re unafraid of experimentation and emotional honesty,” said Joanna Archangel. “We’re out to show that the personal is political — this is much more than a vocal ensemble: it’s the summoning up of a transformative vision of a world without hierarchy and domination.”

The highlight of the evening was an impromptu sing-along of “Amazing Grace,” after which the group signed CD jackets and accepted cooing accolades from partygoers who gushed adoring remarks as they gathered up their wraps and headed home.

Reviews

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3351 comments posted) 22nd March 2007
I think I saw them supporting the Scissor Sisters in Nottinham last year. They were doing well till the fat one got her tits caught in the accordian, the set never really recovered from that. 
I take it you saw the photo and made up the whole thing. 
A really funny and cheeky bit of writing staying juuuust this side of plausible. The style and presentation of it was spot on. Really wonderful stuff, you have my unqualified admiration 
cheers 
J
Zzzzz
Written by Moonglum (15 comments posted) 22nd March 2007
:zzz

Written by Phil (6713 comments posted) 22nd March 2007
Very well written and carefully presented. A work of quality, and yet I can't say I was really that taken by it. It might be more to do with me. I came to this expecting a laugh a minute. What you deliver is good quality 'clever' humour - not funnies. Hope this makes sense. If that's what you were aiming for - and I'm sure you were - my review should be despatched to the waste pile. 
 
Phil.
You once asked...
Written by stevetroster (1549 comments posted) 23rd March 2007
...what it was that you should learn from BBS. 
A) Side splitting, belly aching, tears in your eyes humour. 
I want you to nuke me with your humour, but at present your cruise does make me snooze. 
Less pictures and more laughs please. 
From one Dick to another, 
Best wishes but I'm with Moonglum on this one. 
:zzz
I do what I do
Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 23rd March 2007
Moonglum -- I once read, somewhere, one writer saying that no real writer can learn anything from any other writer. I d what I do, just like Jane does what she does. I'm not a yuck-yuck kid of writer. I wish I could; f I were. maybe I'd be a screen writer in Hollywood or be on the staff of David Letterman. If you want side-splitting, tears-in-the-eyes stuff, I'm afraid i won't be able to give it to you. I model myself after folks like H.L. Mencken and Graham Green, who write sly, dry satire. I'm also a former journalist who has discovered how important graphics are in certain contexts -- and what I do is very much pseudo-journalism. Sorry -- I've heard far too many people (e.g. Bottleblondesurfer) tell me that they like my stuff. Those who know me have said what I do is a unique schtick, and moreover one well-suited for my particular abilities & experience (former college professor & newspaperman). 
You, Moonglum and others critics have a perfect right to find my writing not to their liking -- however, I believe have found my own best formula and intend to stick to it and develop it.
Sayeth the Bard...
Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 23rd March 2007
Excuse the typos -- I haven't yet had my morning coffee. I just wanted to add that telling any writer what one wants him to do doesn't seem, well, quite cricket, as you Brits say. Not to compare myself to The Greats, but people like Joyce and Beckett didn't become what they were by doing what people wanted them to do; they did it by following their own Muse. I'm not a nuke-style humorist, and to quote The Greatest of therm all: "To thine own self remain true."  
Please don't ask me, or expect me to do what I cannot. 

Written by Phil (6713 comments posted) 24th March 2007
A good riposte. 
Phil.
Why use 2 concise words...
Written by Moonglum (15 comments posted) 24th March 2007
when you can drone on for hours! Your defensive posts are like your work. 
"I've heard far too many people (e.g. Bottleblondesurfer) tell me that they like my stuff." 
Shame you don't return the compliment sometimes. How many revues have you done (1). 
You are a person who posts his work expecting praise to be heaped upon him, and when you don't get it....well you go all American. 
How many positive revues do you get these days? 
Perhaps people are tired of your (sly, dry satire.) 
As for me, I'm off now. 
Too many prima donnas for my liking. 
:zzz
Well, well, Moonglum ...
Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 24th March 2007
... I certainly won't descend to the level of the xenophobic remarks in which you indulge, Moonglum, nor will I remark on your rather striking admission that it takes you two hours to read a three or four paragraphs, but I will say I'm disappointed that you've decided to go "ad homimem" and criticize me personally, as opposed to my writing -- which, it seems to me, is not in the best spirit of peer review). 
 
I've been on this site less than a month, not much time to read very much of the worthy material on here, or to submit thoughtful, helpful reviews -- which, in my view. are the only sort worth inflicting on a general readership (as opposed to, say, a snooze smiley, which is not exactly my idea of an articulate critique). It has, however, been enough time to garner a few positive reviews, as can be seen, from Phil, BBS and a couple others.  
 
Incidentally, have sent a couple of PMs to individuals, either in response to a nice remark they've made or to pay a compliment to their work; of course, you're not privy to those, and I would suggest that you are thus speaking from a less-than-knowledgeable position. 
 
Similarly, you are no position to know what my expectations are; I can assure you that I am not out to receive adoring accolades, nor am I unreceptive to constructive criticism. However, I must repeat that writers worth their salt understand what they can and cannot do, and write accordingly.  
 
By all means, please feel free to avoid my work in the future. And as we say over here in the Colonies: have a nice day, dude!

Written by LynB (435 comments posted) 24th March 2007
Hi Dick. For what it's worth, I love your style of work - it is indeed unique, and very cleverly done. 
 
I agree that writers understand what they can and cannot do. I know that my forte is what you might call dramatic fiction - can't think of a better description! However, I know I could not do anything like this, but I admire your ability to do so. 
 
I hope you will keep posting! 
 
Best wishes. :)

Written by anorwegianwood (278 comments posted) 26th March 2007
I enjoyed reading your responses on here almost as much as the work itself. Really good stuff here, in my opinion. 
 
~Claire
An Appreciation
Written by DickPeligro (21 comments posted) 27th March 2007
Dear Ladies & Gentlemen (a salutation which, of course, is not necessarily all-inclusive), 
 
I would be remiss indeed if I didn't express my gratitude for the very gracious and altogether supportive remarks that individuals such as BBS, Phil, LynB, Claire & others have made. Among other things, I'm an erstwhile semi-pro jazz pianist, and I've found that receiving any sort of praise from a fellow musician is somehow sweeter than that from an ordinary listener (although that's very nice too). 
 
In the same way, it's particularly pleasant to read positive remarks from others with the intestinal fortitude to attempt the devilishly difficult task of arranging words on paper (or a computer screen) in such fashion as to be worth the time of others to peruse. 
 
I intend to send a few individuals a PM to respond and amplify privately, but I would like to make a general remark here to all. My Significant Other, Kathryn (herself a professional writer, albeit it in a scientific context) serves not only as an invaluable sounding board and career coach, but also as (to use Abraham Lincoln's sublime term) an Angel of my Better Nature. She's cautioned me not to allow one or two unpleasant individuals to unduly color my perception & attitude vis-vis the 'Great Writing' Community. As usual, she's right. In principle, I've always railed against holding an entire group responsible for the actions of a few, and I'm not going to be guilty of that here. 
 
Incidentally, Phil & Claire, as a lifetime reader of such publications as the NY and London 'Review of Books,' I've come to feel that the authorial riposte qualifies as a literary sub-category in its own right, one that can attain the level of an art form in the right hands. I can scarcely hope to achieve the degree of mastery seen, for example, in the brilliant sparring between Bernard Shaw and Oscar Wilde, but I like to flatter myself that in a battle of wits, I'm not an unarmed man. 
 
One other note: I don't care to annoy anyone by making excuses, not do I wish to bore anyone unduly with a detailed explanation, but a combination of personal and professional matters (such as paying the rent & putting food on the table, as well as familial matters) have been somewhat time-consuming recently and more than a little distracting. That, Friends, is why I have been so laggard with respect to contributing reviews thus far.  
 
I'm a survivor of 11 years of Catholic school, where I learned two things: how to string a few complete sentences together & how to beat my breast and recite "mea culpas." I hereby admit my failings with regard to my dearth of reviews to date, and I duly swear I will do my utmost to correct them in the very near future. I remain ... 
 
Your Humble & Obedient Servant, 
DP 
 
P.S. - I am, by no means, through with Sinead O'Connor ... not by a long shot.

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3351 comments posted) 29th March 2007
I too survived a Catholic education and have the scars[and a few good tales] to show for it. I didn't know Americans did Catholicism. I thought it was whooping and "praise the lord" generic worship. But ,as you say, it does it does turn out fairly literate, if guilt ridden, people which is why I'm surprised it appeals to Americans. I didn't think they did guilt and breast beating [apart from some specialist clubs in New York]. I find it quietly reassuring- don't know why. 
Your comment about 
" the brilliant sparring between Bernard Shaw and Oscar Wilde" reminded me of a spoof of that done by Monty Python which was hilarious. I think Wilde won on a technicality. I'd urge to to hunt it out. It's repeated ad nausium here on cable 
cheers 

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

Next item