Great Writing - Home > Short S. > Political gunshots
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 2005 guests online and 7 members online
Shorts
Political gunshots
By Fledermaus
04 May 2007
 
Two political murders which show a strikingly similarity, even though the victims were rather different...

Delft, July 10 1584,
The prince of Orange had just had dinner with the mayor of Leeuwarden. He was pleased to learn what his subject from far away Friesland had had to tell, and the two men had eaten well. As his nickname suggests, William the Silent was not a man of many words, so it may well have been the mayor who did most of the talking, but no-one knows what was said between them, as more important things were about to happen.

William, the noble freedom-fighter was famous and well liked amongst the Protestants. He had delivered them from the Spanish fury; from the inquisition which demanded heretics to be burned at the stake.
Yet amongst the Catholics he had made his enemies. His followers had taken their churches and destroyed their holy statues, and though in general the prince's troops were tolerant to other faiths, there had been autrocities. The Sea Beggars, a bunch of pirates who suported the Protestant case, had slaughtered many priests and monks, inspite of the prince's objections.
Fighting the mightiest empire in the world, he had little choice but to accept all support that was offered, even when it was from these merciless outlaws. But because of their actions, the war had grown bitter and cruel. The Spanish had retaliated with the complete destruction of a number of the towns, and revenge followed upon revenge. Religiously inspired violence was added to the cruelty of medieval warfare, and not even babies and old women were spared.

William whished the mayor good night and left the room. Just as he was a few steps down the stairs though, a young men came rushing towards him. William recognized him as the French nobleman that had delivered the message of the count of Anjou's death once, but this time there was a harsh expression on his face. In both hands he carried a gun and before the prince could even speak a word, the smoke of gunpowder  filled the air and a bullet pierced his chest. And another, and yet another. Three bullets went right through his body and left bloody traces on the wall behind the Silent.
So violent were these shots, that till this very day the holes in the plaster can be seen...
Pikemen grabbed the assasin and dragged him down the stairs.
The prince, knowing his death was near, uttered his last words in French: "Mon Dieu, mon Dieu, ayez pitié de moi et de ton pauvre peuple". Thereupon he collapsed.
The murderer showed no remorse whatsoever.
" Is he dead?", he cried.
" No", the guards told him, and they saw the disappointment on his face.
Of course Bathasar later found out that his action was succesful, as he was brought to the courtroom. Still he did not show any sign of regret. He had been promissed 25000 crowns by the Spanish king, but even without this reward, he would have killed the Protestant leader, and he only regretted that he did not had the chance to fire all five bullets he had.
Thereupon he was branded, his heart torn out on the rest of his body was dismembered.

Hilversum, May 6 2002,
The independent politician had just given an interview to a number of reporters. Unlike most, these journalists had not been prejudiced, but instead they had asked sharp, but reasonable questions. Pim Fortuyn, the bald dandy was pleased that for once someone had not labeled him a right-wing maverick. It seemed the tide was turning, at last people listened to what he had to say instead of to what was said about him.

He was populair amongst the middle classes and the people living in bad neighbourhoods. At last here was a man who offered solutions to the growing problem of criminality, someone who was not scared of the politically correct bullies of the labour party.
Yet amongst the socialists, he had made his enemies. He had been accused of being an extremist, and was even called a fascist. Several people had threatened him with death and the ruling politicians despised him.
And indeed it seemed that his party was a gathering of weird people with strange ambitions. But he was battling the existing order and could use all support that was offered.

Pim walked onto the courtyard, gave a mini-interview to a beginning reporter and saw one of the journalists he had just spoken to, come after him. He had forgotten his presents. Fortuyn took the little box and shook the man's hand, when suddenly a young man came rushing out of the bushes.
Before the politician could react, a bullet pierced his head, and another, and another. Five bullets were fired and Pim Fortuyn, still holding the shocked journalist's hand, sank down in a puddle of blood.
His driver ran after the assasin, but it took some time before the police arrived and the murderer was apprehended.
He showed no remorse whatsoever, and when Volkert was brought to court it turned out he was an extreme environmentalist who had acted on his own account.
He was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment.

Reviews

Written by Asferthecat (834 comments posted) 4th May 2007
What was William's nickname ? Orange? I read the whole of the first part waiting for the nickname to be revealed. 
I could see no connection between the two crimes except that the assassin used a gun and showed no remorse. 
History is a blank spot with me but I am eager to learn. I suspect you are a historian and assume more knowledge from your readers. 
Apart from these quibbles it was well written and created a clear picture of the deeds. 

Written by Fledermaus (3281 comments posted) 4th May 2007
Hi Asferthecat. 
Oh, it was in the line "Three bullets went right through his body and left bloody traces on the wall behind the Silent." That was his nickname: The Silent. 
 
I think you're right there's no direct connection, but the assasination of Pim Fortuyn was the first of such an attack since the murder of William of Orange. I think the only other other political murder in the Netherlands in between those, was that of Johan and Cornelis the Witt in 1672, but they were lynched by an angry mob, rather than assasinated. 
I thought it was a strange similarity that both murderers intended to fire five bullets, both did so at close distance and in broad daylight with a lot of witnesses and not the slightest chance of getting away. And indeed both showed no remorse and acted out of some crooked ideology (the money was only an extra incentive for Balthasar Gerards). 
 
The two victims were of course very different. William of Orange was a military leader with a clear vision. Pim Fortuyn was a clown whose main purpose seemed to be annoying other politicians.
William the Silent
Written by Fledermaus (3281 comments posted) 4th May 2007
I changed it a bit so that the nickname is mentioned earlier ;)

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3351 comments posted) 4th May 2007
I suppose the political aspect is the only connecting factor. I can see no other real connection beyond the number of shots [did they have six shooters in the mid 1600s, single-shot muskets, surely? but I bow to your knowledge] 
I suppose it is people like those that do, or threaten to, really make a difference that really threaten the status quo, which is neatly maintained by the main parties who cover the power bases. They hate those people more than they hate each other. It confirms that old saying 
"If voting really changed anything they'd make it illegal" 
That's the link that I made anyway and thanks for an interesting piece that made me do a bit of thinking.  
Well that's me done for the weekend!! 
cheers 
Jane
Three shots indeed
Written by Fledermaus (3281 comments posted) 4th May 2007
Thanks BBS, 
It surprised me too that he could fire three shots from one gun, but it is what Balthasar Gerard's own confession says: He bought two guns the day before and filled one with three bullets, the other with two and he fired the first one at the prince of Orange, but was caught before he could fire the second one, which he regretted. 
From that testimony it appears he hated the prince toroughly, for when he visited him before as a messenger he had wanted to kill him already. 
I don't think it would have mattered much for his punishment, but it's strange how defiant and without remorse he still was in court... 

Written by Janie (265 comments posted) 5th May 2007
same crime different punishments. same crime, same lack of remorse.. same crime, and i suspect same reaction of the public (some were quite glad, some were horrified) 
 
Quote:
So violent were these shots, that till this very day the holes in the plaster can be seen...

would they have had plaster in medieval times? i would have thought stone or wood.

Written by Fledermaus (3281 comments posted) 6th May 2007
Thanks Janie. 
Indeed so I think. And what's also interesting is that I don't think the assasins were the most likely people to be this angry with their victims. Balthasar Gerards was a Frenchman, not a Dutch Catholic, and Pim Fortuyn mainly evoked the anger of socialists and Muslims, but his assasin was neither. Interesting coincidence also that the last name of both murderers began with a G... 
 
I think it's plaster. The bulletholes can still be seen in Delft, but I can't remember what the wall was like clearly.

Written by Phil (6713 comments posted) 8th May 2007
Back to history - back home. 
 
You do this sort of thing well.  
 
Just goes to show: the world has always been populated by heartless bastards who don't value life. 
 
Phil.

Written by Fledermaus (3281 comments posted) 9th May 2007
Thanks Phil. 
And not only do they disrespect other people's life, but they don't seem to respect their own's either...

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item