Great Writing - Home > Non-Fiction > The Church of Scientology & the Anger of a Quiet Man
READING ROOM
Great Writing - Home
Read and review others' work
Articles on writing
Advice from the community
COMMUNITY
Talk to others in the forums
Events and Competitions
GW News
ABOUT GREAT WRITING
All About Us
Contact Us
WORK AWAITING REVIEW
GW IS...
Great Writing creative writing community is designed to prompt ideas and provide inspiration and motivation within aspiring and amateur authors. Whatever your topic; from love poetry to Doctor Who or Harry Potter fan fiction, Great Writing's online writing group is where you can make new friends and improve your creative writing.
WHO'S ONLINE
We have 1431 guests online and 5 members online
Non-Fiction
The Church of Scientology & the Anger of a Quiet Man
By twosheds316
15 May 2007
Does the name John Sweeney mean anything to you? If you were to pass him in the street you probably wouldn't look at him twice, yet he's probably the BBC's best investigative journalist.

 

I met the man last year, while he was helping Nicky and Mark Webster with their well publicised case against Norfolk social services. He gave me quite a bit of advice when the social services put a gagging order on the website I'd launched to highlight Nicky and Mark's case. He shook me by the hand, and thanked me for the help I'd not only given to the Websters, but to him as well. He came across as quite an unassuming man, the sort of person who would do anything to help someone in need.


Yesterday Paul told me about some videos that had been posted on YouTube about John's latest project, investigating the Church of Scientology. Paul told me of a video, apparently posted by a member of the church, which shows John blowing up at Tommy Davis. Here's the link; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxqR5NPhtLI Once there you'll also see a couple of other videos that have been uploaded since then, some of them showing their support for what John did.


I didn't actually watch that particular video until a few moments ago, but having heard about it, I decided to watch tonight's edition of Panorama on BBC1, the programme in which John tries to investigate the Church of Scientology.


It certainly made for interesting viewing. The beginning of the programme John told about how he tried to negotiate access to buildings owned by the scientologists, but because John wanted to use certain words such as cult, the talks broke down.


Despite this setback, John decided to continue with his investigation anyway, and investigation that at first took him to Florida. Once there he interviewed a couple, Mike and Donna Henderson, who had been members of the church for thirty years, donating over a million dollars before they left, against the church's wishes, a decade ago.When they left, twenty family members, also scientologists, refused to have anything to do with them or Mike's dying father. They dis-connected, a term used by Scientologists. The sad thing is that Mike's father will probably never see the rest of his children again.


As John went about his investigations in Florida, and later in Los Angeles, he found that he was being stalked. He was followed by cars, and whenever he tried to interview anyone, high-ranking scientologist Tommy Davis would suddenly appear out of nowhere, trying to discredit those John was interviewing, and berating John at every opportunity.


While in Los Angeles, Davis set up a series of interviews for John with several celebrity scientologists, including Ann Archer, Kirty Allie, Leah Reminy and Juliette Lewis. The interviews apparently went well, as they each gave glowing tributes to the church and about how scientology had helped them in their lives.


But the thing was, we didn't actually hear them say this. Just days before the showed aired, a court order was obtained in California threatening legal action against the BBC if they broadcast these comments.


Once the celebrity interviews were finished, Davis launched into another verbal tirade against John. By now Davis' act was becoming tired and boring. He was starting to seem more like a raving madman than a so-called religous figure.


The final straw came during a scientology exhibition called "'Psychiatry: Industry of Death". The exhibition showed some extremely graphic images, and claims that psychiatrists have a master plan or something for taking over the world, and were to blame for the deaths of stars like Billie Holliday and Kurt Cobain, and were also to blame for the events of World War II.


While interviewing a critic of Scientology, who should turn up again but Tommy Davis. Davis, despite not having heard the entire interview, accused John of giving the intervewee an easy ride. Having been stalked by Davis and his various people for nearly a week, John lost it, and got into a shouting match with Davis.


John, showing a great deal of class the likes of which Davis never showed, immediately apologised for his outburst. He also made an apology both on the BBC website, and on air.


But since the filming of the documentary finished, John revealed that he has continued to he harrassed. He wrote on the BBC website; "Back in Britain strangers have called on my neighbours, my mother-in-law's house and someone spied on my wedding and fled the moment he was challenged."


Scientology church founder L. Rob Hubbard once declared that anyone who opposed his religion was "fair game", and could legitimately be tricked, lied, sued of destroyed. Love thy neighbour this certainly isn't, and the church claims that this policy is no longer carried out.


John has been internally disciplined by the BBC for his actions, but he hasn't lost his job. But the real point here is this - in the opinion of many who watched the programme, John Sweeney was "fair game" as far as the scientologists were concerned. He was stalked and harrassed to the point where something had to give.

The Church of Scientology wanted John to give a fair and impartial account of their religion for Panorama, but by not giving him any access to their buildings, they shot themselves in the foot.


I've read a great deal about Scientology over the past few years or so, and most of it hasn't made for comfortable reading. As an advertisement for the church, this was a disaster, as they came across as an over-protective cult who would do anything, at any cost, to protect their precious secrets.


But the refreshing thing is, not all scientologists act in the way that Tommy Davis did.


When he appeared on Friday Night with Jonathan Ross a few weeks ago, Ross asked John Travolta about his religous beliefs. The answer Travolta gave was quite refreshing as he told of how the scientologist belief system and helped the lives of him and his family, although he doesn't feel comfortable trying to force his own beliefs on others.


I believe John Sweeney to be a man of integrity. To go through what he has while doing his job also shows that he is a man of courage. He carried out his investigation in very trying circumstances, and I applaud him for his efforts.

As for The Church of Scientology, they've done nothing to prove that they are nothing more than a cult, as simple as that.


If you want to watch the episode of Panorama yourself to get your own view, here's the link from the BBC website; http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_4120000/newsid_4124500/4124514.stm?bw=bb&mp=wm

Reviews

Written by Bottleblondesurfer (3457 comments posted) 15th May 2007
An interesting and well written piece on a very touchy subject. You managed to stay measured and impartial; though I would disagree that the carefully scripted spin of a deluded individual could be called refreshing. I do think that they are more than a cult, though.They are a very rich,powerful and influential cult. That said, this was an excellent piece of ,well judged, journalism 
cheers 
J

Written by Phil (6851 comments posted) 15th May 2007
Buggeration and damnation - which is what I'm probably due for if Hubbard turns out to be right after all. 
 
Just written a very long and detailed review which has disappeared for some reason. 
 
To summarise: well written piece, enjoyed. You balanced this well, rather too well. Never forget, when you're talking about absolute belief, you're talking about nutters. Absolute belief excuses all sorts of deranged behaviour. (Suicide bombing springs to mind) 
 
I was a little more erudite (and long winded) the first time round. 
 
Phil.
PS
Written by Phil (6851 comments posted) 15th May 2007
Sorry I've not reviewed anything else you've written. Your titles suggest wrestling - which I suffer but detest. 
 
Phil.

Written by coosh (894 comments posted) 15th May 2007
This piece is even-handed, well written and covers all the main points. If I were Outraged of Tunbridge Wells writing to Points of View, I'd have probably queried the timeframe of half an hour for this programme, since it skipped through the salient aspects of the subject, and then focused on demonstrating conclusively what happens when the CoS view you as hostile - but I was still left with questions about "dis-connection", finance and essentially what they actually believed in. 
 
On the strength of Mr. Sweeney's programme, I read Janet Reitman's comprehensive Rolling Stone article - which I would recommend to anyone wanting to fill in the gaps left by Panorama. And the records of that Fishman case... some of that is just surreal!! A far cry from the days when we viewed them as a bunch of a few harmless weirdoes hanging out on Tottenham Court Road, outside that shop that never seemed to close. 
 
Like Phil, I can't remember beyond Big Daddy, Giant Haystack and Mick McManus, so I haven't yet been tempted to view your other pieces.

   Only registered users can rate and write comments.
   Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 Previous item   Next item