Not quite sure where to put this - it is fictional, but not a short story; about poetry, but not a poem itself.
I am pleased and relieved to be able to introduce my collected poems, under the title
Diamond Wedding. Pleased, because it means at least one other person is as crazy as I am; relieved, because this collection spans a lifetime and that’s a long time to hold your breath.
I didn’t intend it to take so long, because I was earmarked to be a star poet at the age of five. I considered myself a paid poet when at nine years old I received ten shillings for six stanzas entitled
Champion’s Return. As adulthood dawned, though, life got in the way of poetry: education and work and marriage and kids and more work and a divorce and a loving marriage once again.
It is hard to be a prolific poet when you aren’t lovelorn, bereaved or drunk, but nonetheless poems emerged, sporadically, in the requisite egotistical spells between necessities. Who lives long enough will accumulate enough works to be collectable. Over sixty years, my life has of its own accord threaded this collection onto the single strand of a story.
I consider my gems diamonds, but you may differ: after all, critics (of neither ability nor repute) have dismissed them in the past. Whether kindly or spitefully they told me that intelligible poetry was suspect. It was rejected for using realism to handle romance, and for exploring emotions not fuelled by angst or chemicals. Finally, however, they damned it as linguistically elitist: using words and structures, rhythms and rhymes that danced across the page. To claim the modern name of poetry, it was implied that the content should be illogical, unpunctuated and badly spelt, self-destructive and uncouth. Its shape could be novel but it absolutely must be clumsy; abstractions and platitudes must spew out only as stuttering, amputated prose.
It seems that my success is to have outlived such fashions. I am very grateful to Jackdaw Poetry who have published this collection and by doing so declared that ordinary life can inform meaningful word-craft; that we do not have to insult our language, nor torture it into incomprehensible shapes, to create poetry that reflects true emotions. They are putting their money where their collective mouths are.
I believe that poetry can be royal without being exclusive, and vivid without being crude. If the magic of words does not touch your heart, my apologies: either your life, or mine, has been sadly ill-spent; it is not for me to say which.
|
Written by Fledermaus (3506 comments posted) 15th July 2007 |
Let's hope you're right. Not just where poetry is concerned, but all the other arts as well. I once visited an art gallery with some friends, and gave my honest opinion on the crap they had put on those walls. For some reason the other visitors were shocked, but hey, wasn't the purpose of the 'artist' to shock? I was just doing the same, except that I was honest rather than commercial. When I see crap, I won't call it by a different name. If artists want to make something abstract and complicated, fine, but let them first prove they know their craft. Mondriaan did, as did Picasso, but nowadays they seem to think they can skip that phase... As far as I am concerned Western arts reached their peak between the 13th and the 18th century. At least then they appreciated skill and beauty. Let's hope for a second renaissance... A very good piece. I would put it in short stories though, even though it doesn't have a real plot... |
Written by Phil (7001 comments posted) 15th July 2007 |
Not sure what this is Sue: an intro to your poems that will be used, or, as your intro suggests, a piece of fiction? Whichever: both reflective and self assured. Having read a lot of your poetry and knowing a little about some of the events behind them, it's also intresting and perhaps adds a little value to them. An easy read - but it says a lot. I particularly enjoyed the 4th paragraph. Good stuff. Phil |
fiction, fiction Written by fellpony (1749 comments posted) 15th July 2007 |
I am not sixty years old and last time I looked I hadn't been married sixty years either (and before anyone cracks the joke, no, it doesn't even feel that long). Therefore this is not the preface to a real collection - it's the piece I wrote for the GW Cambridge competition, a foreword to an imaginary "Collected Works". I suppose I could put it in Advice from the Community, with a "Government Health Warning - contains irony."
|
fellpony, I totally Written by audrie (454 comments posted) 15th July 2007 |
agree with what you have said. By your own definition it can't be poetry, but it is a very good piece of non-fiction. I have been rather surprised at some of the poems, I have to say, why should anyone assume we would be interested in their penis??? Obviously, I'm not talking of your poems! So, hear, hear, I say to your good common sense. |
Don't really care where it goes Written by no1butClo (341 comments posted) 15th July 2007 |
...but some of that definitely needed to be said. I love the last paragraph(s) ["It seems that my success..."] and completely agree with it. We whipper-snappers are trying our best to do it properly, we really are! Thanks for a beautifully reflective piece. clo |
Only registered users can rate and write comments.
Please login or register.